APA (7th ed.) Citation

A, R., AF, N., H, N., & C, M. (2025). Instrument-based, non-cycloplegic versus cycloplegic refraction in pediatric and young adult populations (≤25 years): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Advances in ophthalmology practice and research, 6(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aopr.2025.11.004

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

A, Roque, Nunes AF, Nascimento H, and Martinez-Perez C. "Instrument-based, Non-cycloplegic Versus Cycloplegic Refraction in Pediatric and Young Adult Populations (≤25 Years): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis." Advances in Ophthalmology Practice and Research 6, no. 1 (2025): 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aopr.2025.11.004.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

A, Roque, et al. "Instrument-based, Non-cycloplegic Versus Cycloplegic Refraction in Pediatric and Young Adult Populations (≤25 Years): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis." Advances in Ophthalmology Practice and Research, vol. 6, no. 1, 2025, p. 56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aopr.2025.11.004.