APA (7th ed.) Citation

E, B., İE, D., AT, T., AY, B., MZ, C., A, Ç., . . . E, Ö. (2026). Transperineal cognitive versus trans-rectal fusion biopsy under local anesthesia: Multicenter outcomes in detection rates, complications, and feasibility. International urology and nephrology, 58(8), 3029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-026-05053-z

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

E, Başaran, Dilek İE, Taşkıran AT, Balık AY, Canbolat MZ, Çayırlı A, Ünal SH, Başa H, and Öztürk E. "Transperineal Cognitive Versus Trans-rectal Fusion Biopsy Under Local Anesthesia: Multicenter Outcomes in Detection Rates, Complications, and Feasibility." International Urology and Nephrology 58, no. 8 (2026): 3029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-026-05053-z.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

E, Başaran, et al. "Transperineal Cognitive Versus Trans-rectal Fusion Biopsy Under Local Anesthesia: Multicenter Outcomes in Detection Rates, Complications, and Feasibility." International Urology and Nephrology, vol. 58, no. 8, 2026, p. 3029, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-026-05053-z.