APA (7th ed.) Citation

DW, P., WE, B., R, D. C., E, G., JM, A., CN, B. M., . . . E, B. (2026). Great debate: Preventive percutaneous coronary intervention added to optimal medical treatment should be the default treatment for non-flow-limiting vulnerable plaques. European heart journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehag103

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

DW, Park, et al. "Great Debate: Preventive Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Added to Optimal Medical Treatment Should Be the Default Treatment for Non-flow-limiting Vulnerable Plaques." European Heart Journal 2026. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehag103.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

DW, Park, et al. "Great Debate: Preventive Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Added to Optimal Medical Treatment Should Be the Default Treatment for Non-flow-limiting Vulnerable Plaques." European Heart Journal, 2026, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehag103.