APA (7th ed.) Citation

N, W., J, Y., W, K., Y, Z., Z, H., Y, Y., . . . Z, P. (2026). Head-to-head comparison between 18F-FDG and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in diagnosing recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer. Journal of translational medicine, 24(1), . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-026-08045-w

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

N, Wang, You J, Kong W, Zhu Y, Hong Z, Yang Y, Shi Y, and Pei Z. "Head-to-head Comparison Between 18F-FDG and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in Diagnosing Recurrent and Metastatic Prostate Cancer." Journal of Translational Medicine 24, no. 1 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-026-08045-w.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

N, Wang, et al. "Head-to-head Comparison Between 18F-FDG and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in Diagnosing Recurrent and Metastatic Prostate Cancer." Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 24, no. 1, 2026, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-026-08045-w.