APA (7th ed.) Citation

J, F., C, F., T, S., A, E., O, V., P, A., . . . M, T. (2026). Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for double-lumen tube intubation: The DOuble-Lumen intubation with VIdeolaryngoscopy (DOLVI) multicentre randomised trial. British journal of anaesthesia, 137(1), 254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2026.02.048

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

J, Fernández, et al. "Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Double-lumen Tube Intubation: The DOuble-Lumen Intubation with VIdeolaryngoscopy (DOLVI) Multicentre Randomised Trial." British Journal of Anaesthesia 137, no. 1 (2026): 254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2026.02.048.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

J, Fernández, et al. "Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Double-lumen Tube Intubation: The DOuble-Lumen Intubation with VIdeolaryngoscopy (DOLVI) Multicentre Randomised Trial." British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 137, no. 1, 2026, p. 254, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2026.02.048.