APA (7th ed.) Citation

R, W., M, R., W, Z., AT, H., H, C., SI, K., & AI, M. (2026). Long-Term Risk of Subsequent Cervical Fusion After Endoscopic Versus Open Cervical Decompression. Global spine journal, 21925682261449159. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261449159

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

R, Wang, Rasheed M, Zeng W, Hong AT, Cho H, Khalid SI, and Mehta AI. "Long-Term Risk of Subsequent Cervical Fusion After Endoscopic Versus Open Cervical Decompression." Global Spine Journal 2026: 21925682261449159. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261449159.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

R, Wang, et al. "Long-Term Risk of Subsequent Cervical Fusion After Endoscopic Versus Open Cervical Decompression." Global Spine Journal, 2026, p. 21925682261449159, https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261449159.