APA (7th ed.) Citation

L, W., B, D., CWE, H., J, H., MJ, B., MC, T., . . . AF, v. R. (2026). (f)Utility of cEEG after cardiac arrest should not be judged by its unique prognostic contribution. Critical care (London, England), 30(1), . https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-026-06078-7

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

L, Wieske, Doelkahar B, Hoedemaekers CWE, Hofmeijer J, Blans MJ, Tjepkema-Cloostermans MC, van Putten M, Horn J, and van Rootselaar AF. "(f)Utility of CEEG After Cardiac Arrest Should Not Be Judged by Its Unique Prognostic Contribution." Critical Care (London, England) 30, no. 1 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-026-06078-7.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

L, Wieske, et al. "(f)Utility of CEEG After Cardiac Arrest Should Not Be Judged by Its Unique Prognostic Contribution." Critical Care (London, England), vol. 30, no. 1, 2026, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-026-06078-7.