APA (7th ed.) Citation

CW, N., AG, V., HE, R., CR, R., K, M., HS, H., . . . S, T. (2026). Sacrospinous Hysteropexy With Mesh vs Vaginal Hysterectomy for Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse: 10-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA surgery, 161(8), 764. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2026.2263

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

CW, Nager, et al. "Sacrospinous Hysteropexy With Mesh Vs Vaginal Hysterectomy for Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse: 10-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial." JAMA Surgery 161, no. 8 (2026): 764. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2026.2263.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

CW, Nager, et al. "Sacrospinous Hysteropexy With Mesh Vs Vaginal Hysterectomy for Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse: 10-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial." JAMA Surgery, vol. 161, no. 8, 2026, p. 764, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2026.2263.