APA (7th ed.) Citation

IVM, L., CC, M., SG, K., M, W., J, M., S, v. d. D., . . . M, R. (2026). 3D-Printed Structures Versus Drilled Cavities: A Comparison of Microconfinement Methods for Rheological Characterisation of Multicellular Aggregates. Journal of molecular recognition : JMR, 39(4), e70040. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmr.70040

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

IVM, Lima, Muoghalu CC, Kulkarni SG, Wiemer M, Michalewski J, van den Driesche S, Gehlken W, Vellekoop MJ, and Radmacher M. "3D-Printed Structures Versus Drilled Cavities: A Comparison of Microconfinement Methods for Rheological Characterisation of Multicellular Aggregates." Journal of Molecular Recognition : JMR 39, no. 4 (2026): e70040. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmr.70040.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

IVM, Lima, et al. "3D-Printed Structures Versus Drilled Cavities: A Comparison of Microconfinement Methods for Rheological Characterisation of Multicellular Aggregates." Journal of Molecular Recognition : JMR, vol. 39, no. 4, 2026, p. e70040, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmr.70040.