APA (7th ed.) Citation

MM, S., S, F., M, K., IC, A., U, A., J, S. J., . . . M, K. (2026). Angiography-derived physiology versus pressure wire-based fractional flow reserve for coronary revascularization guidance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JRSM cardiovascular disease, 15, 20480040261469414. https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040261469414

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

MM, Shah, et al. "Angiography-derived Physiology Versus Pressure Wire-based Fractional Flow Reserve for Coronary Revascularization Guidance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis." JRSM Cardiovascular Disease 15 (2026): 20480040261469414. https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040261469414.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

MM, Shah, et al. "Angiography-derived Physiology Versus Pressure Wire-based Fractional Flow Reserve for Coronary Revascularization Guidance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis." JRSM Cardiovascular Disease, vol. 15, 2026, p. 20480040261469414, https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040261469414.