APA (7th ed.) Citation

M, S., SM, D., SB, S., NM, K., A, N., M, T., . . . R, J. (2026). Angiography-derived versus pressure-wire-based physiological assessment to guide percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC cardiovascular disorders. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-06305-7

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

M, Sarwar, et al. "Angiography-derived Versus Pressure-wire-based Physiological Assessment to Guide Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials." BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 2026. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-06305-7.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

M, Sarwar, et al. "Angiography-derived Versus Pressure-wire-based Physiological Assessment to Guide Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials." BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 2026, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-06305-7.