APA (7th ed.) Citation

AE, B., G, T., Y, Y., S, M., AI, B., Z, I., . . . S, K. (2026). Oral sulfate-based versus low-volume polyethylene glycol-ascorbate regimens for colonoscopy preparation in the geriatric population: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical endoscopy, 59(4), 557. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2025.430

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

AE, Bardak, Teker G, Yalcin Y, Mitev S, Bardak AI, Istemihan Z, Ozturk NB, and Krishnan S. "Oral Sulfate-based Versus Low-volume Polyethylene Glycol-ascorbate Regimens for Colonoscopy Preparation in the Geriatric Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials." Clinical Endoscopy 59, no. 4 (2026): 557. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2025.430.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

AE, Bardak, et al. "Oral Sulfate-based Versus Low-volume Polyethylene Glycol-ascorbate Regimens for Colonoscopy Preparation in the Geriatric Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials." Clinical Endoscopy, vol. 59, no. 4, 2026, p. 557, https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2025.430.