APA (7th ed.) Citation

GE, H., R, E., & B, M. (1996). Clinical comparison of the BACTEC 9000 Standard Anaerobic/F and Lytic/F blood culture media. Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 24(4), 191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-8893(96)00060-0

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

GE, Hollick, Edinger R, and Martin B. "Clinical Comparison of the BACTEC 9000 Standard Anaerobic/F and Lytic/F Blood Culture Media." Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 24, no. 4 (1996): 191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-8893(96)00060-0.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

GE, Hollick, et al. "Clinical Comparison of the BACTEC 9000 Standard Anaerobic/F and Lytic/F Blood Culture Media." Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, vol. 24, no. 4, 1996, p. 191, https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-8893(96)00060-0.