View in EDS PDF Full Text ePub Full Text

Controversies in Spine Surgery, MIS Versus OPEN : Best Evidence Recommendations

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Controversies in Spine Surgery, MIS Versus OPEN : Best Evidence Recommendations
Description: Master spine surgeons Alexander R. Vaccaro, Richard G. Fessler, and a cadre of esteemed co-editors have compiled the most comprehensive textbook to date detailing minimally invasive spine (MIS) versus open spine surgery techniques. Controversies in Spine Surgery, MIS versus OPEN: Best Evidence Recommendations features debates by renowned experts on one of the most provocative topics in spine surgery. Twenty-four chapters systematically organized into four sections — degenerative, trauma, tumor, and other issues, cover procedures and underlying pathologies, backed by a large, diverse body of literature.MIS and open approaches are thoroughly compared and contrasted in each chapter. Evidence is presented and analyzed in an objective manner with'opposing sides'presenting differing opinions and techniques, resulting in a synchronous collection of pros and cons. Every chapter is masterfully summed up by the book's editors — each of whom have varying stances on the topics at hand. This unique'duel'and'duet'discussion enables readers to assimilate information, benefit from the balanced harmony between divergent opinions, and reach their own conclusions.Key HighlightsComparative risks, benefits, complications, and outcomes for a full spectrum of lumbar, thoracic and cervical proceduresMIS versus open approaches for lumbar stenosis, synovial cysts, lumbar adjacent segment degeneration, degenerative scoliosis, flatback syndrome, thoracic disc herniation, and dural tearsTumor resection and stabilization, quality of life issues, and potential advantages and risks of MIS techniquesKey differences in MIS versus open operations such as radiation exposure and costsAnalysis of 3-D navigational imaging to improve outcomes and reduce radiation exposure and operating timeThis book is a tremendous, evidence-based tool to guide spine surgeons as they make important decisions on selecting the most optimal spine surgery techniques. It is a must-have resource for all resident and veteran orthopaedic surgeons and neurosurgeons who specialize in treating patients with spine conditions.
Authors: Alexander R. Vaccaro, Richard Glenn Fessler, Faheem A. Sandhu, Jean-Marc Voyadzis, Jason C. Eck, Christopher K. Kepler
Resource Type: eBook.
Subjects: Spine--surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, Orthopedic Procedures, Evidence-Based Medicine, Spinal Fractures--surgery, Spinal Neoplasms--surgery
Categories: MEDICAL / Surgery / Neurosurgery, MEDICAL / Neurology, MEDICAL / Orthopedics
Database: eBook Collection (EBSCOhost)
FullText Links:
  – Type: ebook-pdf
  – Type: ebook-epub
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: nlebk
DbLabel: eBook Collection (EBSCOhost)
An: 1691803
RelevancyScore: 1084
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: eBook
PubTypeId: ebook
PreciseRelevancyScore: 1083.55249023438
IllustrationInfo
ImageInfo – Size: thumb
  Target: https://rps2images.ebscohost.com/rpsweb/othumb?id=NL$1691803$PDF&s=r
– Size: medium
  Target: https://rps2images.ebscohost.com/rpsweb/othumb?id=NL$1691803$PDF&s=d
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Controversies in Spine Surgery, MIS Versus OPEN : Best Evidence Recommendations
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Description
  Group: Ab
  Data: Master spine surgeons Alexander R. Vaccaro, Richard G. Fessler, and a cadre of esteemed co-editors have compiled the most comprehensive textbook to date detailing minimally invasive spine (MIS) versus open spine surgery techniques. Controversies in Spine Surgery, MIS versus OPEN: Best Evidence Recommendations features debates by renowned experts on one of the most provocative topics in spine surgery. Twenty-four chapters systematically organized into four sections — degenerative, trauma, tumor, and other issues, cover procedures and underlying pathologies, backed by a large, diverse body of literature.MIS and open approaches are thoroughly compared and contrasted in each chapter. Evidence is presented and analyzed in an objective manner with'opposing sides'presenting differing opinions and techniques, resulting in a synchronous collection of pros and cons. Every chapter is masterfully summed up by the book's editors — each of whom have varying stances on the topics at hand. This unique'duel'and'duet'discussion enables readers to assimilate information, benefit from the balanced harmony between divergent opinions, and reach their own conclusions.Key HighlightsComparative risks, benefits, complications, and outcomes for a full spectrum of lumbar, thoracic and cervical proceduresMIS versus open approaches for lumbar stenosis, synovial cysts, lumbar adjacent segment degeneration, degenerative scoliosis, flatback syndrome, thoracic disc herniation, and dural tearsTumor resection and stabilization, quality of life issues, and potential advantages and risks of MIS techniquesKey differences in MIS versus open operations such as radiation exposure and costsAnalysis of 3-D navigational imaging to improve outcomes and reduce radiation exposure and operating timeThis book is a tremendous, evidence-based tool to guide spine surgeons as they make important decisions on selecting the most optimal spine surgery techniques. It is a must-have resource for all resident and veteran orthopaedic surgeons and neurosurgeons who specialize in treating patients with spine conditions.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Alexander+R%2E+Vaccaro%22">Alexander R. Vaccaro</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Richard+Glenn+Fessler%22">Richard Glenn Fessler</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Faheem+A%2E+Sandhu%22">Faheem A. Sandhu</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jean-Marc+Voyadzis%22">Jean-Marc Voyadzis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jason+C%2E+Eck%22">Jason C. Eck</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Christopher+K%2E+Kepler%22">Christopher K. Kepler</searchLink>
– Name: TypePub
  Label: Resource Type
  Group: TypPub
  Data: eBook.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Spine--surgery%22">Spine--surgery</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minimally+Invasive+Surgical+Procedures%22">Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Orthopedic+Procedures%22">Orthopedic Procedures</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evidence-Based+Medicine%22">Evidence-Based Medicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Spinal+Fractures--surgery%22">Spinal Fractures--surgery</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Spinal+Neoplasms--surgery%22">Spinal Neoplasms--surgery</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectBISAC
  Label: Categories
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="ZK" term="%22MEDICAL+%2F+Surgery+%2F+Neurosurgery%22">MEDICAL / Surgery / Neurosurgery</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="ZK" term="%22MEDICAL+%2F+Neurology%22">MEDICAL / Neurology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="ZK" term="%22MEDICAL+%2F+Orthopedics%22">MEDICAL / Orthopedics</searchLink>
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=nlebk&AN=1691803
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Classifications:
      – Code: 617.5
        Scheme: ddc
        Type: prePub
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Spine--surgery
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Orthopedic Procedures
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evidence-Based Medicine
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Spinal Fractures--surgery
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Spinal Neoplasms--surgery
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Controversies in Spine Surgery, MIS Versus OPEN : Best Evidence Recommendations
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Alexander R. Vaccaro
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Richard Glenn Fessler
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Faheem A. Sandhu
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jean-Marc Voyadzis
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jason C. Eck
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Christopher K. Kepler
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Alexander R. Vaccaro
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Richard Glenn Fessler
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Faheem A. Sandhu
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jean-Marc Voyadzis
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jason C. Eck
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Christopher K. Kepler
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2018
            – D: 06
              M: 04
              Type: profile
              Y: 2018
          Identifiers:
            – Type: isbn-print
              Value: 9781604068818
            – Type: isbn-electronic
              Value: 9781638533290
            – Type: isbn-electronic
              Value: 9781604068825
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Controversies in Spine Surgery, MIS Versus OPEN : Best Evidence Recommendations
              Type: main
ResultId 1