Mars Adapting : Military Change During War
Saved in:
| Title: | Mars Adapting : Military Change During War |
|---|---|
| Description: | As Clausewitz observed, “In war more than anywhere else, things do not turn out as we expect.” The essence of war is a competitive reciprocal relationship with an adversary. Commanders and institutional leaders must recognize shortfalls and resolve gaps rapidly in the middle of the fog of war. The side that reacts best (and absorbs faster) increases its chances of winning. Mars Adapting examines what makes some military organizations better at this contest than others. It explores the institutional characteristics or attributes at play in learning quickly. Adaptation requires a dynamic process of acquiring knowledge, the utilization of that knowledge to alter a unit's skills, and the sharing of that learning to other units to integrate and institutionalize better operational practice. Mars Adapting explores the internal institutional factors that promote and enable military adaptation. It employs four cases, drawing upon one from each of the U.S. armed services. Each case was an extensive campaign, with several cycles of action/counteraction. In each case the military institution entered the war with an existing mental model of the war they expected to fight. For example, the U.S. Navy prepared for decades to defeat the Japanese Imperial Navy and had developed carried-based aviation. Other capabilities, particularly the Fleet submarine, were applied as a major adaptation. The author establishes a theory called Organizational Learning Capacity that captures the transition of experience and knowledge from individuals into larger and higher levels of each military service through four major steps. The learning/change cycle is influenced, he argues, by four institutional attributes (leadership, organizational culture, learning mechanisms, and dissemination mechanisms). The dynamic interplay of these institutional enablers shaped their ability to perceive and change appropriately. |
| Authors: | Francis Hoffman |
| Resource Type: | eBook. |
| Subjects: | Tactics--Case studies, Adaptability (Psychology), Organizational learning--United States--Case studies, Military art and science--Case studies, Military doctrine--United States--Case studies, Operational art (Military science)--Case studies, Organizational change--United States--Case studies, History, Electronic books |
| Categories: | HISTORY / Military / Strategy |
| Database: | eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) |
| FullText | Links: – Type: ebook-epub Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: nlebk DbLabel: eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) An: 2708134 RelevancyScore: 1103 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: eBook PubTypeId: ebook PreciseRelevancyScore: 1103.19409179688 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| ImageInfo | – Size: thumb Target: https://rps2images.ebscohost.com/rpsweb/othumb?id=NL$2708134$EPUB&s=r – Size: medium Target: https://rps2images.ebscohost.com/rpsweb/othumb?id=NL$2708134$EPUB&s=d |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Mars Adapting : Military Change During War – Name: Abstract Label: Description Group: Ab Data: As Clausewitz observed, “In war more than anywhere else, things do not turn out as we expect.” The essence of war is a competitive reciprocal relationship with an adversary. Commanders and institutional leaders must recognize shortfalls and resolve gaps rapidly in the middle of the fog of war. The side that reacts best (and absorbs faster) increases its chances of winning. Mars Adapting examines what makes some military organizations better at this contest than others. It explores the institutional characteristics or attributes at play in learning quickly. Adaptation requires a dynamic process of acquiring knowledge, the utilization of that knowledge to alter a unit's skills, and the sharing of that learning to other units to integrate and institutionalize better operational practice. Mars Adapting explores the internal institutional factors that promote and enable military adaptation. It employs four cases, drawing upon one from each of the U.S. armed services. Each case was an extensive campaign, with several cycles of action/counteraction. In each case the military institution entered the war with an existing mental model of the war they expected to fight. For example, the U.S. Navy prepared for decades to defeat the Japanese Imperial Navy and had developed carried-based aviation. Other capabilities, particularly the Fleet submarine, were applied as a major adaptation. The author establishes a theory called Organizational Learning Capacity that captures the transition of experience and knowledge from individuals into larger and higher levels of each military service through four major steps. The learning/change cycle is influenced, he argues, by four institutional attributes (leadership, organizational culture, learning mechanisms, and dissemination mechanisms). The dynamic interplay of these institutional enablers shaped their ability to perceive and change appropriately. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Francis+Hoffman%22">Francis Hoffman</searchLink> – Name: TypePub Label: Resource Type Group: TypPub Data: eBook. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tactics--Case+studies%22">Tactics--Case studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adaptability+%28Psychology%29%22">Adaptability (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Organizational+learning--United+States--Case+studies%22">Organizational learning--United States--Case studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Military+art+and+science--Case+studies%22">Military art and science--Case studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Military+doctrine--United+States--Case+studies%22">Military doctrine--United States--Case studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Operational+art+%28Military+science%29--Case+studies%22">Operational art (Military science)--Case studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Organizational+change--United+States--Case+studies%22">Organizational change--United States--Case studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22History%22">History</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electronic+books%22">Electronic books</searchLink> – Name: SubjectBISAC Label: Categories Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="ZK" term="%22HISTORY+%2F+Military+%2F+Strategy%22">HISTORY / Military / Strategy</searchLink> |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=nlebk&AN=2708134 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Classifications: – Code: 355.02 Scheme: ddc Type: prePub Languages: – Code: eng Text: English Subjects: – SubjectFull: Tactics--Case studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Adaptability (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Organizational learning--United States--Case studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Military art and science--Case studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Military doctrine--United States--Case studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Operational art (Military science)--Case studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Organizational change--United States--Case studies Type: general – SubjectFull: History Type: general – SubjectFull: Electronic books Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Mars Adapting : Military Change During War Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Francis Hoffman – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Francis Hoffman IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2021 – D: 12 M: 03 Type: profile Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: isbn-print Value: 9781682475898 – Type: isbn-print Value: 9781557502254 – Type: isbn-electronic Value: 9781682475904 Titles: – TitleFull: Mars Adapting : Military Change During War Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |