Psychological characteristics of patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1.
Saved in:
| Title: | Psychological characteristics of patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Bertrand, J. A., Jean, S., Laberge, L., Gagnon, C., Mathieu, J., Gagnon, J. F., Richer, L. |
| Source: | Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. Jul2015, Vol. 132 Issue 1, p49-58. 10p. |
| Subjects: | Motor ability, Mental illness, Myotonia atrophica, Questionnaires, Diagnosis, Patients, Therapeutics |
| Abstract: | Objectives Myotonic dystrophy type 1 ( DM1) is the most common adult-onset muscular dystrophy. It is associated with motor symptoms but patients also display non-motor symptoms such as particular personality traits. Studies have reported mixed results about personality characteristics which may be attributable to small sample sizes, different disease severity of groups studied, and use of different questionnaires or method. This study aimed to describe the psychological characteristics of a large cohort of patients with DM1, to characterize those at risk of developing a psychiatric disorder, and to compare characteristics between two DM1 phenotypes, a mild and more severe adult-onset phenotype. Methods Two hundred patients with DM1 (152 adult-onset; 48 mild) were asked to complete questionnaires assessing personality traits, psychological symptoms, self-esteem, and suicidal risk. Neurological and neuropsychological assessments were performed to compare personality characteristics to clinical and cognitive measures. Results Patients with DM1 globally showed personality traits and psychological symptoms in the average range compared to normative data, with normal levels of self-esteem and suicidal ideation. However, 27% of patients were found to be at high risk of developing a psychiatric disorder. Moreover, psychological traits differed across phenotypes, with the most severe phenotype tending to show more severe psychological symptoms. The presence of higher phobic anxiety and lower self-esteem was associated with lower education, a higher number of CTG repeats, more severe muscular impairment, and lower cognitive functioning ( P < 0.001). Conclusions Different phenotypes should thus be taken into account in clinical settings for individual management of patients and optimizing therapeutic success. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Acta Neurologica Scandinavica is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
Be the first to leave a comment!
