Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening Invitation Letters.
Saved in:
| Title: | Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening Invitation Letters. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Decker, Kathleen M. (AUTHOR), Turner, Donna (AUTHOR), Demers, Alain A. (AUTHOR), Martens, Patricia J. (AUTHOR), Lambert, Pascal (AUTHOR), Chateau, Daniel (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Women's Health (15409996). Aug2013, Vol. 22 Issue 8, p687-693. 7p. |
| Subjects: | Health promotion, Cervix uteri tumors, Census, Cluster analysis (Statistics), Confidence intervals, Epidemiology, Health behavior, Medical screening, Multivariate analysis, Nosology, Pap test, Population geography, Mathematical models of psychology, Statistical sampling, Logistic regression analysis, Data analysis, Randomized controlled trials, Print materials, Evaluation of human services programs, Data analysis software, Descriptive statistics, Diagnosis |
| Geographic Terms: | Manitoba |
| Abstract: | Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an invitation letter on cervical screening participation among unscreened women 30 to 69 years of age. Methods: A cluster randomized trial design was used in which unscreened women ( n=31,452) were randomized by the forward sortation area (FSA) of their postal code to an intervention group that was sent an invitation letter ( n=17,068) or a group that was not sent an invitation letter ( n=14,384). Results: Six months after the letters were mailed, 1,010 women in the intervention group (5.92%) and 441 women in the control group (3.06%) had a Pap test. After adjusting for variables that have previously shown to influence screening participation, women who were sent an invitation letter were significantly more likely to have had a Pap test in the next 6 months compared with women who were not sent an invitation letter (odds ratio [OR]=2.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.09-3.35, p<0.001). Overall, the effectiveness of the invitation letter improved with increasing age ( p=0.02). Conclusions: Sending invitation letters increased cervical screening participation but because the overall effect was small, additional strategies that remove barriers to screening for unscreened women are also necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Women's Health (15409996) is the property of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 104207453 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening Invitation Letters. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Decker%2C+Kathleen+M%2E%22">Decker, Kathleen M.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Turner%2C+Donna%22">Turner, Donna</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Demers%2C+Alain+A%2E%22">Demers, Alain A.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Martens%2C+Patricia+J%2E%22">Martens, Patricia J.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lambert%2C+Pascal%22">Lambert, Pascal</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chateau%2C+Daniel%22">Chateau, Daniel</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Women's+Health+%2815409996%29%22">Journal of Women's Health (15409996)</searchLink>. Aug2013, Vol. 22 Issue 8, p687-693. 7p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+promotion%22">Health promotion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cervix+uteri+tumors%22">Cervix uteri tumors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Census%22">Census</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cluster+analysis+%28Statistics%29%22">Cluster analysis (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Epidemiology%22">Epidemiology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+behavior%22">Health behavior</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+screening%22">Medical screening</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multivariate+analysis%22">Multivariate analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nosology%22">Nosology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pap+test%22">Pap test</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Population+geography%22">Population geography</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematical+models+of+psychology%22">Mathematical models of psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+sampling%22">Statistical sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Logistic+regression+analysis%22">Logistic regression analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis%22">Data analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Randomized+controlled+trials%22">Randomized controlled trials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Print+materials%22">Print materials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+of+human+services+programs%22">Evaluation of human services programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diagnosis%22">Diagnosis</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Manitoba%22">Manitoba</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an invitation letter on cervical screening participation among unscreened women 30 to 69 years of age. Methods: A cluster randomized trial design was used in which unscreened women ( n=31,452) were randomized by the forward sortation area (FSA) of their postal code to an intervention group that was sent an invitation letter ( n=17,068) or a group that was not sent an invitation letter ( n=14,384). Results: Six months after the letters were mailed, 1,010 women in the intervention group (5.92%) and 441 women in the control group (3.06%) had a Pap test. After adjusting for variables that have previously shown to influence screening participation, women who were sent an invitation letter were significantly more likely to have had a Pap test in the next 6 months compared with women who were not sent an invitation letter (odds ratio [OR]=2.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.09-3.35, p<0.001). Overall, the effectiveness of the invitation letter improved with increasing age ( p=0.02). Conclusions: Sending invitation letters increased cervical screening participation but because the overall effect was small, additional strategies that remove barriers to screening for unscreened women are also necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Women's Health (15409996) is the property of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=104207453 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1089/jwh.2012.4203 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 7 StartPage: 687 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Health promotion Type: general – SubjectFull: Cervix uteri tumors Type: general – SubjectFull: Census Type: general – SubjectFull: Cluster analysis (Statistics) Type: general – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals Type: general – SubjectFull: Epidemiology Type: general – SubjectFull: Health behavior Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical screening Type: general – SubjectFull: Multivariate analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Nosology Type: general – SubjectFull: Pap test Type: general – SubjectFull: Population geography Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematical models of psychology Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical sampling Type: general – SubjectFull: Logistic regression analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Randomized controlled trials Type: general – SubjectFull: Print materials Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation of human services programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis software Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Diagnosis Type: general – SubjectFull: Manitoba Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening Invitation Letters. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Decker, Kathleen M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Turner, Donna – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Demers, Alain A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Martens, Patricia J. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lambert, Pascal – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Chateau, Daniel IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 08 Text: Aug2013 Type: published Y: 2013 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 15409996 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 22 – Type: issue Value: 8 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Women's Health (15409996) Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |