Predictors of outcome in first-episode schizophrenia over the first 4 years of illness.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Predictors of outcome in first-episode schizophrenia over the first 4 years of illness.
Authors: Whitty P (AUTHOR), Clarke M (AUTHOR), McTigue O (AUTHOR), Browne S (AUTHOR), Kamali M (AUTHOR), Kinsella A (AUTHOR), Larkin C (AUTHOR), O'Callaghan E (AUTHOR)
Source: Psychological Medicine. Aug2008, Vol. 38 Issue 8, p1141-1146. 6p.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The outcome of schizophrenia appears to be more favourable than once thought. However, methodological issues, including the reliance on diagnosis at first presentation have limited the validity of outcome studies to date.MethodWe conducted a first-episode follow-up study of 97 patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia over the first 4 years of illness. First presentation and follow-up assessments were compared using paired t tests and a forced-entry regression analysis was used to determine prognostic variables. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in positive and negative symptoms and global assessment of functioning between first presentation and follow-up. At first presentation, fewer negative symptoms (t=-3.40, p<0.01), more years spent in education (t=3.25, p<0.01), and a shorter duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) (t=-2.77, p<0.01) significantly predicted a better outcome at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of schizophrenia may not be as pessimistic as once thought and most patients did not display a downward deteriorating course of illness. This study supports the relationship between DUP and outcome beyond the early stages of illness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Psychological Medicine is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first