Efficacy information in contraceptive counseling: those little white lies.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Efficacy information in contraceptive counseling: those little white lies.
Authors: Trussell TJ (AUTHOR), Faden R (AUTHOR), Hatcher RA (AUTHOR)
Source: American Journal of Public Health. Aug1976, Vol. 66 Issue 8, p761-767. 7p.
Abstract: Various procedures for estimating the effectiveness of a method of contraception have been devised. These measures, in turn, have been used in populations which differ widely in their propensity to u se contraceptives properly. Therefore, a wide army of failure rates is available in the family planning literature. Unfortunately, because of differences in measurement and in chalice of population, a random selection of these reported failure rates will not produce a consistent ordinal or cardinal ranking of methods by their effectiveness. Moreover, such a wide variety of reported rates permits the family planning practitioner to choose selectively in order maximize the attractiveness of his favorite method(s). By surveying family planning personnel in two major cities, we found thai they do indeed appear to place the methods they actively dispense in an extremely favorable position. Specifically, they are biased against the traditional contraceptives, foam and the condom. In this paper, we discuss the theoretical underpinnings of the measurement of effectiveness, report the apparent bias in the levels of contraceptive effectiveness reported to the patient, and finally, recommend a procedure for eliminating the jumble of rates in the literature and the corn sequent confusion among family planning personnel. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of American Journal of Public Health is the property of American Public Health Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 107751857
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Efficacy information in contraceptive counseling: those little white lies.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Trussell+TJ%22">Trussell TJ</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Faden+R%22">Faden R</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hatcher+RA%22">Hatcher RA</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22American+Journal+of+Public+Health%22">American Journal of Public Health</searchLink>. Aug1976, Vol. 66 Issue 8, p761-767. 7p.
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Various procedures for estimating the effectiveness of a method of contraception have been devised. These measures, in turn, have been used in populations which differ widely in their propensity to u se contraceptives properly. Therefore, a wide army of failure rates is available in the family planning literature. Unfortunately, because of differences in measurement and in chalice of population, a random selection of these reported failure rates will not produce a consistent ordinal or cardinal ranking of methods by their effectiveness. Moreover, such a wide variety of reported rates permits the family planning practitioner to choose selectively in order maximize the attractiveness of his favorite method(s). By surveying family planning personnel in two major cities, we found thai they do indeed appear to place the methods they actively dispense in an extremely favorable position. Specifically, they are biased against the traditional contraceptives, foam and the condom. In this paper, we discuss the theoretical underpinnings of the measurement of effectiveness, report the apparent bias in the levels of contraceptive effectiveness reported to the patient, and finally, recommend a procedure for eliminating the jumble of rates in the literature and the corn sequent confusion among family planning personnel. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of American Journal of Public Health is the property of American Public Health Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=107751857
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.2105/AJPH.66.8.761
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 7
        StartPage: 761
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Efficacy information in contraceptive counseling: those little white lies.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Trussell TJ
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Faden R
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hatcher RA
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: Aug1976
              Type: published
              Y: 1976
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00900036
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 66
            – Type: issue
              Value: 8
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: American Journal of Public Health
              Type: main
ResultId 1