Protection motivation theory and social distancing behaviour in response to a simulated infectious disease epidemic.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Protection motivation theory and social distancing behaviour in response to a simulated infectious disease epidemic.
Authors: Williams, Lynn (AUTHOR), Rasmussen, Susan (AUTHOR), Kleczkowski, Adam (AUTHOR), Maharaj, Savi (AUTHOR), Cairns, Nicole (AUTHOR)
Source: Psychology, Health & Medicine. Oct2015, Vol. 20 Issue 7, p832-837. 6p. 2 Charts.
Subjects: Social distancing, Communicable diseases, Epidemics, Intention, Motivation (Psychology), Psychology, Questionnaires, Self-efficacy, Self-evaluation, Mathematical variables, Video games, Theory, Multiple regression analysis, Relative medical risk, Cross-sectional method, Descriptive statistics
Geographic Terms: Scotland
Abstract: Epidemics of respiratory infectious disease remain one of the most serious health risks facing the population. Non-pharmaceutical interventions (e.g. hand-washing or wearing face masks) can have a significant impact on the course of an infectious disease epidemic. The current study investigated whether protection motivation theory (PMT) is a useful framework for understanding social distancing behaviour (i.e. the tendency to reduce social contacts) in response to a simulated infectious disease epidemic. There were 230 participants (109 males, 121 females, mean age 32.4 years) from the general population who completed self-report measures assessing the components of PMT. In addition, participants completed a computer game which simulated an infectious disease epidemic in order to provide a measure of social distancing behaviour. The regression analyses revealed that none of the PMT variables were significant predictors of social distancing behaviour during the simulation task. However, fear (? = .218,p < .001), response efficacy (? = .175,p < .01) and self-efficacy (? = .251,p < .001) were all significant predictors of intention to engage in social distancing behaviour. Overall, the PMT variables (and demographic factors) explain 21.2% of the variance in intention. The findings demonstrated that PMT was a useful framework for understanding intention to engage in social distancing behaviour, but not actual behaviour during the simulated epidemic. These findings may reflect an intention-behaviour gap in relation to social distancing behaviour. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
Copyright of Psychology, Health & Medicine is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 108741275
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Protection motivation theory and social distancing behaviour in response to a simulated infectious disease epidemic.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Williams%2C+Lynn%22&quot;&gt;Williams, Lynn&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Rasmussen%2C+Susan%22&quot;&gt;Rasmussen, Susan&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Kleczkowski%2C+Adam%22&quot;&gt;Kleczkowski, Adam&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Maharaj%2C+Savi%22&quot;&gt;Maharaj, Savi&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Cairns%2C+Nicole%22&quot;&gt;Cairns, Nicole&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22Psychology%2C+Health+%26+Medicine%22&quot;&gt;Psychology, Health &amp; Medicine&lt;/searchLink&gt;. Oct2015, Vol. 20 Issue 7, p832-837. 6p. 2 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Social+distancing%22&quot;&gt;Social distancing&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Communicable+diseases%22&quot;&gt;Communicable diseases&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Epidemics%22&quot;&gt;Epidemics&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Intention%22&quot;&gt;Intention&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Motivation+%28Psychology%29%22&quot;&gt;Motivation (Psychology)&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Psychology%22&quot;&gt;Psychology&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Questionnaires%22&quot;&gt;Questionnaires&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Self-efficacy%22&quot;&gt;Self-efficacy&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Self-evaluation%22&quot;&gt;Self-evaluation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Mathematical+variables%22&quot;&gt;Mathematical variables&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Video+games%22&quot;&gt;Video games&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Theory%22&quot;&gt;Theory&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Multiple+regression+analysis%22&quot;&gt;Multiple regression analysis&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Relative+medical+risk%22&quot;&gt;Relative medical risk&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Cross-sectional+method%22&quot;&gt;Cross-sectional method&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Descriptive+statistics%22&quot;&gt;Descriptive statistics&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Scotland%22&quot;&gt;Scotland&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Epidemics of respiratory infectious disease remain one of the most serious health risks facing the population. Non-pharmaceutical interventions (e.g. hand-washing or wearing face masks) can have a significant impact on the course of an infectious disease epidemic. The current study investigated whether protection motivation theory (PMT) is a useful framework for understanding social distancing behaviour (i.e. the tendency to reduce social contacts) in response to a simulated infectious disease epidemic. There were 230 participants (109 males, 121 females, mean age 32.4&#160;years) from the general population who completed self-report measures assessing the components of PMT. In addition, participants completed a computer game which simulated an infectious disease epidemic in order to provide a measure of social distancing behaviour. The regression analyses revealed that none of the PMT variables were significant predictors of social distancing behaviour during the simulation task. However, fear (?&#160;=&#160;.218,p&#160;&lt;&#160;.001), response efficacy (?&#160;=&#160;.175,p&#160;&lt;&#160;.01) and self-efficacy (?&#160;=&#160;.251,p&#160;&lt;&#160;.001) were all significant predictors of intention to engage in social distancing behaviour. Overall, the PMT variables (and demographic factors) explain 21.2% of the variance in intention. The findings demonstrated that PMT was a useful framework for understanding intention to engage in social distancing behaviour, but not actual behaviour during the simulated epidemic. These findings may reflect an intention-behaviour gap in relation to social distancing behaviour. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of Psychology, Health &amp; Medicine is the property of Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=108741275
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/13548506.2015.1028946
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 6
        StartPage: 832
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Social distancing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Communicable diseases
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Epidemics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Intention
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Motivation (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Questionnaires
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self-efficacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self-evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mathematical variables
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Video games
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Theory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Multiple regression analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Relative medical risk
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cross-sectional method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scotland
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Protection motivation theory and social distancing behaviour in response to a simulated infectious disease epidemic.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Williams, Lynn
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rasmussen, Susan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kleczkowski, Adam
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Maharaj, Savi
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cairns, Nicole
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Text: Oct2015
              Type: published
              Y: 2015
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 13548506
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 20
            – Type: issue
              Value: 7
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Psychology, Health & Medicine
              Type: main
ResultId 1