(How) does positive and negative extended cross-group contact predict direct cross-group contact and intergroup attitudes?
Saved in:
| Title: | (How) does positive and negative extended cross-group contact predict direct cross-group contact and intergroup attitudes? |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Mazziotta, Agostino, Rohmann, Anette, Wright, Stephen C., De Tezanos‐Pinto, Pablo, Lutterbach, Sebastian |
| Source: | European Journal of Social Psychology. Aug2015, Vol. 45 Issue 5, p653-667. 12p. 2 Diagrams, 5 Charts. |
| Subjects: | Anxiety, Attitude (Psychology), Confidence intervals, Group identity, Interpersonal relations, Cultural pluralism, Probability theory, Regression analysis, Self-efficacy, Social norms, Social participation, Surveys, T-test (Statistics), Group process, Social attitudes, Maximum likelihood statistics, Cross-sectional method, Descriptive statistics |
| Abstract: | Knowing that fellow ingroup members have cross-group contact can affect how people think, feel, and behave towards an out-group. Previous research on extended contact focused almost exclusively on positive cross-group interactions, neglecting the fact that extended contact can also be negative. In this contribution, we introduce negative extended contact and investigate how both forms of extended contact predict direct cross-group contact and intergroup attitudes. In two cross-sectional studies (N1 = 286, N2 = 237), we found evidence that positive and negative extended contact uniquely predict intergroup attitudes, and that direct cross-group contact mediates this effect. In Study 2, we also provide initial evidence that extended contact might either prepare for or impair direct contact by changing ingroup norms and intergroup self-efficacy, which in turn influence feelings of intergroup anxiety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of European Journal of Social Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 108997460 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: (How) does positive and negative extended cross-group contact predict direct cross-group contact and intergroup attitudes? – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mazziotta%2C+Agostino%22">Mazziotta, Agostino</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rohmann%2C+Anette%22">Rohmann, Anette</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wright%2C+Stephen+C%2E%22">Wright, Stephen C.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22De+Tezanos‐Pinto%2C+Pablo%22">De Tezanos‐Pinto, Pablo</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lutterbach%2C+Sebastian%22">Lutterbach, Sebastian</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22European+Journal+of+Social+Psychology%22">European Journal of Social Psychology</searchLink>. Aug2015, Vol. 45 Issue 5, p653-667. 12p. 2 Diagrams, 5 Charts. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Anxiety%22">Anxiety</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attitude+%28Psychology%29%22">Attitude (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Group+identity%22">Group identity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interpersonal+relations%22">Interpersonal relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cultural+pluralism%22">Cultural pluralism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Probability+theory%22">Probability theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Regression+analysis%22">Regression analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-efficacy%22">Self-efficacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+norms%22">Social norms</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+participation%22">Social participation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surveys%22">Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22T-test+%28Statistics%29%22">T-test (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Group+process%22">Group process</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+attitudes%22">Social attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Maximum+likelihood+statistics%22">Maximum likelihood statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cross-sectional+method%22">Cross-sectional method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Knowing that fellow ingroup members have cross-group contact can affect how people think, feel, and behave towards an out-group. Previous research on extended contact focused almost exclusively on positive cross-group interactions, neglecting the fact that extended contact can also be negative. In this contribution, we introduce negative extended contact and investigate how both forms of extended contact predict direct cross-group contact and intergroup attitudes. In two cross-sectional studies (N1 = 286, N2 = 237), we found evidence that positive and negative extended contact uniquely predict intergroup attitudes, and that direct cross-group contact mediates this effect. In Study 2, we also provide initial evidence that extended contact might either prepare for or impair direct contact by changing ingroup norms and intergroup self-efficacy, which in turn influence feelings of intergroup anxiety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of European Journal of Social Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=108997460 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/ejsp.2110 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 12 StartPage: 653 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Anxiety Type: general – SubjectFull: Attitude (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals Type: general – SubjectFull: Group identity Type: general – SubjectFull: Interpersonal relations Type: general – SubjectFull: Cultural pluralism Type: general – SubjectFull: Probability theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Regression analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Self-efficacy Type: general – SubjectFull: Social norms Type: general – SubjectFull: Social participation Type: general – SubjectFull: Surveys Type: general – SubjectFull: T-test (Statistics) Type: general – SubjectFull: Group process Type: general – SubjectFull: Social attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Maximum likelihood statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Cross-sectional method Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: (How) does positive and negative extended cross-group contact predict direct cross-group contact and intergroup attitudes? Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mazziotta, Agostino – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rohmann, Anette – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wright, Stephen C. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: De Tezanos‐Pinto, Pablo – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lutterbach, Sebastian IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 08 Text: Aug2015 Type: published Y: 2015 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00462772 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 45 – Type: issue Value: 5 Titles: – TitleFull: European Journal of Social Psychology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |