View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Enigmatic Masculinities: A Reply to Swartz and Grossmark.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Enigmatic Masculinities: A Reply to Swartz and Grossmark.
Authors: Burkhalter, Thomas (AUTHOR)
Source: Psychoanalytic Dialogues. May/Jun2016, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p365-371. 7p.
Subjects: Masculinity, Prospecting, Impasse (Psychotherapy), Seduction, Vection
Abstract: In reply to Swartz and Grossmark’s commentaries on my paper about encounters with the masculine, I elaborate from a reflexive stance on the notions of context, positionality, and warrants to speak in my writing and the responses. My account is part of an unfolding exploration of how I stand as a gendered being within psychotherapeutic praxis, and in line with that, how what was intimated in my original paper points to Laplanche’s theorizing on the sexual and to his notion of enigmatic seduction in ongoing gendering processes. The reply finds itself haunted by the abject and its position within the postcolony, and with a desire for what is an illusory transcendence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Psychoanalytic Dialogues is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 116124105
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Enigmatic Masculinities: A Reply to Swartz and Grossmark.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burkhalter%2C+Thomas%22">Burkhalter, Thomas</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Psychoanalytic+Dialogues%22">Psychoanalytic Dialogues</searchLink>. May/Jun2016, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p365-371. 7p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Masculinity%22">Masculinity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prospecting%22">Prospecting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Impasse+%28Psychotherapy%29%22">Impasse (Psychotherapy)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Seduction%22">Seduction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vection%22">Vection</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: In reply to Swartz and Grossmark’s commentaries on my paper about encounters with the masculine, I elaborate from a reflexive stance on the notions of context, positionality, and warrants to speak in my writing and the responses. My account is part of an unfolding exploration of how I stand as a gendered being within psychotherapeutic praxis, and in line with that, how what was intimated in my original paper points to Laplanche’s theorizing on the sexual and to his notion of enigmatic seduction in ongoing gendering processes. The reply finds itself haunted by the abject and its position within the postcolony, and with a desire for what is an illusory transcendence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Psychoanalytic Dialogues is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=116124105
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/10481885.2016.1169045
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 7
        StartPage: 365
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Masculinity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Prospecting
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Impasse (Psychotherapy)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Seduction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Vection
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Enigmatic Masculinities: A Reply to Swartz and Grossmark.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Burkhalter, Thomas
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Text: May/Jun2016
              Type: published
              Y: 2016
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10481885
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 26
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Psychoanalytic Dialogues
              Type: main
ResultId 1