Conveying campus sexual misconduct policy information to college and university students: Results from a 7-campus study.
Saved in:
| Title: | Conveying campus sexual misconduct policy information to college and university students: Results from a 7-campus study. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Potter, S. J. (AUTHOR), Edwards, K. M. (AUTHOR), Banyard, V. L. (AUTHOR), Stapleton, J. G. (AUTHOR), Demers, J. M. (AUTHOR), Moynihan, M. M. (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of American College Health. Sep2016, Vol. 64 Issue 6, p438-447. 10p. 1 Illustration, 1 Diagram. |
| Subjects: | Sex crime prevention, Analysis of covariance, Student cheating, College students, Discussion, Help-seeking behavior, Information resources management, Intellect, Medical cooperation, Multivariate analysis, Probability theory, Questionnaires, Reading, Regression analysis, Research, Statistical sampling, Scale analysis (Psychology), School environment, School administration, Statistics, Student attitudes, T-test (Statistics), Universities & colleges, Video recording, Data analysis, Randomized controlled trials, Pre-tests & post-tests, Descriptive statistics, Inferential statistics |
| Geographic Terms: | United States |
| Abstract: | Objective: To examine the efficacy of different methods (ie, in-class policy reading; in-class policy reading and discussion; no reading or discussion) to deliver campus sexual misconduct policy information to students on 7 campuses. Participants: A total of 1,195 participants at 7 colleges and universities participated in the study from August to October 2014. Participants were randomly assigned at the class level and completed pretest and posttest surveys assessing knowledge of campus policy and resources and confidence to seek help for sexual assault. Results: Students exposed to a larger dosage of material (in-class policy reading plus discussion) showed greater positive changes in attitudes and knowledge than students who did not receive information or were only read the policy. However, on some indices, students who were only read the policy showed positive outcomes compared with students receiving no intervention. Conclusion: Colleges and universities must use engaging methods to disseminate campus sexual misconduct policies to students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of American College Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 118293755 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Conveying campus sexual misconduct policy information to college and university students: Results from a 7-campus study. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Potter%2C+S%2E+J%2E%22">Potter, S. J.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Edwards%2C+K%2E+M%2E%22">Edwards, K. M.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Banyard%2C+V%2E+L%2E%22">Banyard, V. L.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stapleton%2C+J%2E+G%2E%22">Stapleton, J. G.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Demers%2C+J%2E+M%2E%22">Demers, J. M.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Moynihan%2C+M%2E+M%2E%22">Moynihan, M. M.</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+American+College+Health%22">Journal of American College Health</searchLink>. Sep2016, Vol. 64 Issue 6, p438-447. 10p. 1 Illustration, 1 Diagram. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sex+crime+prevention%22">Sex crime prevention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Analysis+of+covariance%22">Analysis of covariance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+cheating%22">Student cheating</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+students%22">College students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discussion%22">Discussion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Help-seeking+behavior%22">Help-seeking behavior</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+resources+management%22">Information resources management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intellect%22">Intellect</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+cooperation%22">Medical cooperation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multivariate+analysis%22">Multivariate analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Probability+theory%22">Probability theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading%22">Reading</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Regression+analysis%22">Regression analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research%22">Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+sampling%22">Statistical sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scale+analysis+%28Psychology%29%22">Scale analysis (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+environment%22">School environment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+administration%22">School administration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistics%22">Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+attitudes%22">Student attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22T-test+%28Statistics%29%22">T-test (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Universities+%26+colleges%22">Universities & colleges</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Video+recording%22">Video recording</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis%22">Data analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Randomized+controlled+trials%22">Randomized controlled trials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pre-tests+%26+post-tests%22">Pre-tests & post-tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Inferential+statistics%22">Inferential statistics</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Objective: To examine the efficacy of different methods (ie, in-class policy reading; in-class policy reading and discussion; no reading or discussion) to deliver campus sexual misconduct policy information to students on 7 campuses. Participants: A total of 1,195 participants at 7 colleges and universities participated in the study from August to October 2014. Participants were randomly assigned at the class level and completed pretest and posttest surveys assessing knowledge of campus policy and resources and confidence to seek help for sexual assault. Results: Students exposed to a larger dosage of material (in-class policy reading plus discussion) showed greater positive changes in attitudes and knowledge than students who did not receive information or were only read the policy. However, on some indices, students who were only read the policy showed positive outcomes compared with students receiving no intervention. Conclusion: Colleges and universities must use engaging methods to disseminate campus sexual misconduct policies to students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of American College Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=118293755 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/07448481.2016.1178122 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 10 StartPage: 438 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Sex crime prevention Type: general – SubjectFull: Analysis of covariance Type: general – SubjectFull: Student cheating Type: general – SubjectFull: College students Type: general – SubjectFull: Discussion Type: general – SubjectFull: Help-seeking behavior Type: general – SubjectFull: Information resources management Type: general – SubjectFull: Intellect Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical cooperation Type: general – SubjectFull: Multivariate analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Probability theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Questionnaires Type: general – SubjectFull: Reading Type: general – SubjectFull: Regression analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical sampling Type: general – SubjectFull: Scale analysis (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: School environment Type: general – SubjectFull: School administration Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Student attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: T-test (Statistics) Type: general – SubjectFull: Universities & colleges Type: general – SubjectFull: Video recording Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Randomized controlled trials Type: general – SubjectFull: Pre-tests & post-tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Inferential statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: United States Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Conveying campus sexual misconduct policy information to college and university students: Results from a 7-campus study. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Potter, S. J. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Edwards, K. M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Banyard, V. L. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Stapleton, J. G. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Demers, J. M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Moynihan, M. M. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Text: Sep2016 Type: published Y: 2016 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 07448481 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 64 – Type: issue Value: 6 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of American College Health Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |