Methods for validating chronometry of computerized tests.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Methods for validating chronometry of computerized tests.
Authors: Salmon, Joshua P. (AUTHOR), Jones, Stephanie A. H. (AUTHOR), Wright, Chris P. (AUTHOR), Butler, Beverly C. (AUTHOR), Klein, Raymond M. (AUTHOR), Eskes, Gail A. (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology. Mar2017, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p190-210. 21p.
Subjects: Time perception, Reaction time, Psychophysiology, Motor ability, Neuropsychological tests
Abstract: Determining the speed at which a task is performed (i.e., reaction time) can be a valuable tool in both research and clinical assessments. However, standard computer hardware employed for measuring reaction times (e.g., computer monitor, keyboard, or mouse) can add nonrepresentative noise to the data, potentially compromising the accuracy of measurements and the conclusions drawn from the data. Therefore, an assessment of the accuracy and precision of measurement should be included along with the development of computerized tests and assessment batteries that rely on reaction times as the dependent variable. This manuscript outlines three methods for assessing the temporal accuracy of reaction time data (one employing external chronometry). Using example data collected from the Dalhousie Computerized Attention Battery (DalCAB) we discuss the detection, measurement, and correction of nonrepresentative noise in reaction time measurement. The details presented in this manuscript should act as a cautionary tale to any researchers or clinicians gathering reaction time data, but who have not yet considered methods for verifying the internal chronometry of the software and or hardware being used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 120809316
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Methods for validating chronometry of computerized tests.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Salmon%2C+Joshua+P%2E%22">Salmon, Joshua P.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jones%2C+Stephanie+A%2E+H%2E%22">Jones, Stephanie A. H.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wright%2C+Chris+P%2E%22">Wright, Chris P.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Butler%2C+Beverly+C%2E%22">Butler, Beverly C.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Klein%2C+Raymond+M%2E%22">Klein, Raymond M.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Eskes%2C+Gail+A%2E%22">Eskes, Gail A.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Clinical+%26+Experimental+Neuropsychology%22">Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology</searchLink>. Mar2017, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p190-210. 21p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Time+perception%22">Time perception</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reaction+time%22">Reaction time</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychophysiology%22">Psychophysiology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Motor+ability%22">Motor ability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Neuropsychological+tests%22">Neuropsychological tests</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Determining the speed at which a task is performed (i.e., reaction time) can be a valuable tool in both research and clinical assessments. However, standard computer hardware employed for measuring reaction times (e.g., computer monitor, keyboard, or mouse) can add nonrepresentative noise to the data, potentially compromising the accuracy of measurements and the conclusions drawn from the data. Therefore, an assessment of the accuracy and precision of measurement should be included along with the development of computerized tests and assessment batteries that rely on reaction times as the dependent variable. This manuscript outlines three methods for assessing the temporal accuracy of reaction time data (one employing external chronometry). Using example data collected from the Dalhousie Computerized Attention Battery (DalCAB) we discuss the detection, measurement, and correction of nonrepresentative noise in reaction time measurement. The details presented in this manuscript should act as a cautionary tale to any researchers or clinicians gathering reaction time data, but who have not yet considered methods for verifying the internal chronometry of the software and or hardware being used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=120809316
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1215411
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 21
        StartPage: 190
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Time perception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reaction time
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychophysiology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Motor ability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Neuropsychological tests
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Methods for validating chronometry of computerized tests.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Salmon, Joshua P.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jones, Stephanie A. H.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wright, Chris P.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Butler, Beverly C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Klein, Raymond M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Eskes, Gail A.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 03
              Text: Mar2017
              Type: published
              Y: 2017
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 13803395
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 39
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology
              Type: main
ResultId 1