Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Attribute Structure and Incidental Memory for Words: Test of a Developmental Hypothesis. |
| Authors: |
Ghatala, Elizabeth S., Carbonari, Joseph P., Wylie, H. Lee |
| Source: |
Child Development. Sep1980, Vol. 51 Issue 3, p685-690. 6p. |
| Subjects: |
Memory, Systemic memory hypothesis, Semantics, Attitude (Psychology), Semantic differential scale, Personality tests, Child psychology |
| Abstract: |
In an incidental memory task, second-, sixth-, and tenth-grade students performed 3 orienting tasks on different subsets of items in a list of common nouns. In one condition (EPA), children judged words on the evaluative, potency, and activity dimensions of the semantic differential. In another condition (EEE), children judged words on only the evaluative dimension. In a third condition, children made phonetic judgments. Analysis of recall scores supported the hypothesis that superiority of semantic over phonetic encoding would increase with age. However, results did not support the hypothesis that superiority of the EPA condition over the EEE condition would emerge with age as children's semantic structures became more differentiated. In fact, the 2 conditions did not differ at any grade. In a second experiment, a shift in recall favoring the EPA over the EEE condition was observed between tenth graders and adults. It was speculated that, `in addition to dimensional independence which emerges by age 12, relatively equal weighting of dimensions within semantic structure, which may not appear until adulthood, is a necessary condition for the facilitating effect of multiple-dimension encoding to occur. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Child Development is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |