Hebb repetition effects for non-verbal visual sequences: determinants of sequence acquisition.
Saved in:
| Title: | Hebb repetition effects for non-verbal visual sequences: determinants of sequence acquisition. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Johnson, Andrew J. (AUTHOR), Dygacz, Artur (AUTHOR), Miles, Christopher (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Memory. Oct2017, Vol. 25 Issue 9, p1279-1293. 15p. |
| Subjects: | Repetition (Learning process), Visual memory, Short-term memory, Serial ordering, Cognition |
| Abstract: | We report four experiments premised upon the work of Horton et al. [(2008). Hebb repetition effects in visual memory: The roles of verbal rehearsal and distinctiveness.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(12), 1769–1777] and Page et al. [(2013). Repetition-spacing and item-overlap effects in the Hebb repetition task.Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 506–526], and explore conditions under which the visual Hebb repetition effect is observed. Experiment 1 showed that repetition learning is evident when the items comprising the non-repeated (filler) sequences and the repeated (Hebb) sequences are different (no-overlap). However, learning is abolished when the filler and Hebb sequences comprise the same items (full-overlap). Learning of the repeated sequence persisted when repetition spacing was increased to six trials (Experiment 2), consistent with that shown for verbal stimuli (Page et al., 2013). In Experiment 3, it was shown that learning for the repeated sequence is accentuated when the output motor response at test is also repeated for the Hebb sequence, but only under conditions of no-overlap. In Experiment 4, repetition spacing was re-examined with a repeated motor output response (a closer methodological analogue to Page et al., 2013). Under these conditions, the gradient of Hebb repetition learning for six trial repetition intervals was markedly similar to that for three trial intervals. These findings further support the universality of the Hebb repetition effect across memory and are discussed in terms of evidence for amodality within-sequence memory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Memory is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 124896075 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Hebb repetition effects for non-verbal visual sequences: determinants of sequence acquisition. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Johnson%2C+Andrew+J%2E%22">Johnson, Andrew J.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dygacz%2C+Artur%22">Dygacz, Artur</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Miles%2C+Christopher%22">Miles, Christopher</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Memory%22">Memory</searchLink>. Oct2017, Vol. 25 Issue 9, p1279-1293. 15p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Repetition+%28Learning+process%29%22">Repetition (Learning process)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Visual+memory%22">Visual memory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Short-term+memory%22">Short-term memory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Serial+ordering%22">Serial ordering</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognition%22">Cognition</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: We report four experiments premised upon the work of Horton et al. [(2008). Hebb repetition effects in visual memory: The roles of verbal rehearsal and distinctiveness.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(12), 1769–1777] and Page et al. [(2013). Repetition-spacing and item-overlap effects in the Hebb repetition task.Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 506–526], and explore conditions under which the visual Hebb repetition effect is observed. Experiment 1 showed that repetition learning is evident when the items comprising the non-repeated (filler) sequences and the repeated (Hebb) sequences are different (no-overlap). However, learning is abolished when the filler and Hebb sequences comprise the same items (full-overlap). Learning of the repeated sequence persisted when repetition spacing was increased to six trials (Experiment 2), consistent with that shown for verbal stimuli (Page et al., 2013). In Experiment 3, it was shown that learning for the repeated sequence is accentuated when the output motor response at test is also repeated for the Hebb sequence, but only under conditions of no-overlap. In Experiment 4, repetition spacing was re-examined with a repeated motor output response (a closer methodological analogue to Page et al., 2013). Under these conditions, the gradient of Hebb repetition learning for six trial repetition intervals was markedly similar to that for three trial intervals. These findings further support the universality of the Hebb repetition effect across memory and are discussed in terms of evidence for amodality within-sequence memory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Memory is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=124896075 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1293692 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 StartPage: 1279 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Repetition (Learning process) Type: general – SubjectFull: Visual memory Type: general – SubjectFull: Short-term memory Type: general – SubjectFull: Serial ordering Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognition Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Hebb repetition effects for non-verbal visual sequences: determinants of sequence acquisition. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Johnson, Andrew J. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Dygacz, Artur – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Miles, Christopher IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 10 Text: Oct2017 Type: published Y: 2017 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 09658211 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 25 – Type: issue Value: 9 Titles: – TitleFull: Memory Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |