View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Putting Raters in Ratees’ Shoes: Perspective Taking and Assessment of Creative Products.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Putting Raters in Ratees’ Shoes: Perspective Taking and Assessment of Creative Products.
Authors: Han, Jiantao (AUTHOR), Long, Haiying (AUTHOR), Pang, Weiguo (AUTHOR)
Source: Creativity Research Journal. Jul-Sep2017, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p270-281. 12p.
Subjects: Creative ability testing, Creative ability education, Sensory perception, Sixth grade (Education), Undergraduates
Abstract: This study reported 2 experiments that studied the effect of perspective taking on assessment of creative products by using human raters. Forty responses of 2 alternative uses tasks (AUTs) and 15 alien stories generated by 6th-grade students were used as assessment materials. Undergraduate students as the novice raters assessed the products under 3 experimental conditions: assessing without any information of the ratees, assessing only with age information of the ratees, and assessing with age information and taking the perspective of the ratees. Results of Experiment 1 showed significant differences in creativity ratings between group 1 and 2. But no significant difference was found between group 2 and 3. In Experiment 2, raters in group 1 used objective perception and raters in group 3 were asked to take the perspective for more time. Raters in group 3 assigned higher ratings than the other 2 groups but no difference was found between group 1 and 2. Overall, the results showed the effect of perspective taking on assessment of creative products. Possible mechanisms of the effect and implications for creativity assessment and creativity teaching practice were discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Creativity Research Journal is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 125207618
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Putting Raters in Ratees’ Shoes: Perspective Taking and Assessment of Creative Products.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Han%2C+Jiantao%22">Han, Jiantao</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Long%2C+Haiying%22">Long, Haiying</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pang%2C+Weiguo%22">Pang, Weiguo</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Creativity+Research+Journal%22">Creativity Research Journal</searchLink>. Jul-Sep2017, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p270-281. 12p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Creative+ability+testing%22">Creative ability testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Creative+ability+education%22">Creative ability education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sensory+perception%22">Sensory perception</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sixth+grade+%28Education%29%22">Sixth grade (Education)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduates%22">Undergraduates</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This study reported 2 experiments that studied the effect of perspective taking on assessment of creative products by using human raters. Forty responses of 2 alternative uses tasks (AUTs) and 15 alien stories generated by 6th-grade students were used as assessment materials. Undergraduate students as the novice raters assessed the products under 3 experimental conditions: assessing without any information of the ratees, assessing only with age information of the ratees, and assessing with age information and taking the perspective of the ratees. Results of Experiment 1 showed significant differences in creativity ratings between group 1 and 2. But no significant difference was found between group 2 and 3. In Experiment 2, raters in group 1 used objective perception and raters in group 3 were asked to take the perspective for more time. Raters in group 3 assigned higher ratings than the other 2 groups but no difference was found between group 1 and 2. Overall, the results showed the effect of perspective taking on assessment of creative products. Possible mechanisms of the effect and implications for creativity assessment and creativity teaching practice were discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Creativity Research Journal is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=125207618
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/10400419.2017.1360062
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 12
        StartPage: 270
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Creative ability testing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Creative ability education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sensory perception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sixth grade (Education)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Undergraduates
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Putting Raters in Ratees’ Shoes: Perspective Taking and Assessment of Creative Products.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Han, Jiantao
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Long, Haiying
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pang, Weiguo
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: Jul-Sep2017
              Type: published
              Y: 2017
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10400419
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 29
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Creativity Research Journal
              Type: main
ResultId 1