Assessing catastrophic thinking associated with debilitating mental health conditions.
Saved in:
| Title: | Assessing catastrophic thinking associated with debilitating mental health conditions. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Moore, Emily (AUTHOR), Adams, Heather (AUTHOR), Ellis, Tamra (AUTHOR), Thibault, Pascal (AUTHOR), Sullivan, Michael J. L. (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Disability & Rehabilitation. Feb2018, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p317-322. 6p. |
| Subjects: | Statistical correlation, Mental depression, Factor analysis, Mental illness, Musculoskeletal system diseases, Probability theory, Psychometrics, Questionnaires, Research evaluation, Research funding, T-test (Statistics), Effect sizes (Statistics), McGill Pain Questionnaire, Research methodology evaluation, Descriptive statistics |
| Abstract: | Purpose:The present study examined the psychometric properties of theSymptom Catastrophizing Scale(SCS). The SCS items were drawn from the Pain Catastrophizing Scale but were modified to make them better suited to the context of debilitating mental health conditions that are not necessarily associated with pain. The number of items was reduced from 13 to 7, and the response scale was simplified. Methods:The SCS was administered to individuals diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) (N = 79) or with a chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) condition (N = 88). Results:Exploratory factor analyzes revealed single factor solutions of the SCS for both the MSK and MDD samples. The internal consistency of the SCS was good. The SCS was significantly correlated with measures of pain severity, depressive symptom severity and disability in both samples. Individuals with MDD scored higher on the SCS than individuals with MSK. The SCS was shown to be sensitive to treatment-related reductions in catastrophic thinking. Conclusions:Preliminary analyzes suggest that the SCS is a reliable and valid measure of symptom-related catastrophic thinking associated with debilitating mental health conditions.Implications for RehabilitationAlthough catastrophic thinking has been identified as a risk factor for disability, current assessment tools are not well suited for individuals with debilitating mental health conditions.This paper describes a brief assessment instrument that can be used to assess catastrophic thinking in individuals with debilitating mental health conditions.The results of this study suggest that targeting catastrophic thinking might yield reductions in symptom severity and disability in work-disabled individuals with major depressive disorder. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] |
| Copyright of Disability & Rehabilitation is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 126206430 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Assessing catastrophic thinking associated with debilitating mental health conditions. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Moore%2C+Emily%22">Moore, Emily</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Adams%2C+Heather%22">Adams, Heather</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ellis%2C+Tamra%22">Ellis, Tamra</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thibault%2C+Pascal%22">Thibault, Pascal</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sullivan%2C+Michael+J%2E+L%2E%22">Sullivan, Michael J. L.</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Disability+%26+Rehabilitation%22">Disability & Rehabilitation</searchLink>. Feb2018, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p317-322. 6p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+correlation%22">Statistical correlation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+depression%22">Mental depression</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Factor+analysis%22">Factor analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+illness%22">Mental illness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Musculoskeletal+system+diseases%22">Musculoskeletal system diseases</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Probability+theory%22">Probability theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychometrics%22">Psychometrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+evaluation%22">Research evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22T-test+%28Statistics%29%22">T-test (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Effect+sizes+%28Statistics%29%22">Effect sizes (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22McGill+Pain+Questionnaire%22">McGill Pain Questionnaire</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology+evaluation%22">Research methodology evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Purpose:The present study examined the psychometric properties of theSymptom Catastrophizing Scale(SCS). The SCS items were drawn from the Pain Catastrophizing Scale but were modified to make them better suited to the context of debilitating mental health conditions that are not necessarily associated with pain. The number of items was reduced from 13 to 7, and the response scale was simplified. Methods:The SCS was administered to individuals diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) (N = 79) or with a chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) condition (N = 88). Results:Exploratory factor analyzes revealed single factor solutions of the SCS for both the MSK and MDD samples. The internal consistency of the SCS was good. The SCS was significantly correlated with measures of pain severity, depressive symptom severity and disability in both samples. Individuals with MDD scored higher on the SCS than individuals with MSK. The SCS was shown to be sensitive to treatment-related reductions in catastrophic thinking. Conclusions:Preliminary analyzes suggest that the SCS is a reliable and valid measure of symptom-related catastrophic thinking associated with debilitating mental health conditions.Implications for RehabilitationAlthough catastrophic thinking has been identified as a risk factor for disability, current assessment tools are not well suited for individuals with debilitating mental health conditions.This paper describes a brief assessment instrument that can be used to assess catastrophic thinking in individuals with debilitating mental health conditions.The results of this study suggest that targeting catastrophic thinking might yield reductions in symptom severity and disability in work-disabled individuals with major depressive disorder. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Disability & Rehabilitation is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=126206430 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1254283 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 6 StartPage: 317 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Statistical correlation Type: general – SubjectFull: Mental depression Type: general – SubjectFull: Factor analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Mental illness Type: general – SubjectFull: Musculoskeletal system diseases Type: general – SubjectFull: Probability theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychometrics Type: general – SubjectFull: Questionnaires Type: general – SubjectFull: Research evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Research funding Type: general – SubjectFull: T-test (Statistics) Type: general – SubjectFull: Effect sizes (Statistics) Type: general – SubjectFull: McGill Pain Questionnaire Type: general – SubjectFull: Research methodology evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Assessing catastrophic thinking associated with debilitating mental health conditions. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Moore, Emily – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Adams, Heather – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ellis, Tamra – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Thibault, Pascal – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sullivan, Michael J. L. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 02 Text: Feb2018 Type: published Y: 2018 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 09638288 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 40 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Disability & Rehabilitation Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |