View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

An evaluation of the effectiveness of a computer‐assisted reading intervention.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: An evaluation of the effectiveness of a computer‐assisted reading intervention.
Authors: Messer, David, Nash, Gilly
Source: Journal of Research in Reading. Feb2018, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p140-158. 19p.
Subjects: Computer assisted reading instruction, Learning, Randomized controlled trials, Phonetics, Mnemonics, School children, Primary education
Abstract: Background: A cost‐effective method to address reading delays is to use computer‐assisted learning, but these techniques are not always effective. Methods: We evaluated a commercially available computer system that uses visual mnemonics, in a randomised controlled trial with 78 English‐speaking children (mean age 7 years) who their schools identified as needing reading support. School‐based individual tutorials usually took place 2–3 times/week. Only the experimental group received the intervention in the first 10 months; thereafter, both the experimental and control groups received the intervention for 6 months. Results: After 10 months, the experimental group had significantly higher standardised scores than the waiting list control group of decoding, phonological awareness, naming speed, phonological short‐term memory and executive loaded working memory. Conclusions: The computer‐assisted intervention was effective, and this suggests that this medium can be used for reading interventions with English‐speaking children. What is already known about this topic There are comparatively few randomised controlled trial evaluations of computer‐based reading interventions. Meta‐analyses report small positive effect sizes for such interventions with English‐speaking children. The use of visual mnemonics to improve reading has rarely been investigated. What this paper adds The findings suggest that computer‐based interventions for English‐speaking, struggling readers can be effective. The effects extended beyond the targeted abilities, and a longer intervention was more effective than a shorter one. Apart from spelling, the mean reading and reading related standardised scores for children at the end of the intervention were above or just below 100. Implications for theory, policy or practice Computer‐based interventions can be used to support English‐speaking, struggling readers, and their effects can go beyond targeted abilities. The use of visual mnemonics and the development of the intervention programme over a number of years could have contributed to this success. The role of visual mnemonics as a help for struggling readers deserves further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Research in Reading is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 127241959
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: An evaluation of the effectiveness of a computer‐assisted reading intervention.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Messer%2C+David%22">Messer, David</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nash%2C+Gilly%22">Nash, Gilly</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Research+in+Reading%22">Journal of Research in Reading</searchLink>. Feb2018, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p140-158. 19p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+assisted+reading+instruction%22">Computer assisted reading instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning%22">Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Randomized+controlled+trials%22">Randomized controlled trials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Phonetics%22">Phonetics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mnemonics%22">Mnemonics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+children%22">School children</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Primary+education%22">Primary education</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: A cost‐effective method to address reading delays is to use computer‐assisted learning, but these techniques are not always effective. Methods: We evaluated a commercially available computer system that uses visual mnemonics, in a randomised controlled trial with 78 English‐speaking children (mean age 7 years) who their schools identified as needing reading support. School‐based individual tutorials usually took place 2–3 times/week. Only the experimental group received the intervention in the first 10 months; thereafter, both the experimental and control groups received the intervention for 6 months. Results: After 10 months, the experimental group had significantly higher standardised scores than the waiting list control group of decoding, phonological awareness, naming speed, phonological short‐term memory and executive loaded working memory. Conclusions: The computer‐assisted intervention was effective, and this suggests that this medium can be used for reading interventions with English‐speaking children. <italic>What is already known about this topic</italic> There are comparatively few randomised controlled trial evaluations of computer‐based reading interventions. Meta‐analyses report small positive effect sizes for such interventions with English‐speaking children. The use of visual mnemonics to improve reading has rarely been investigated. <italic>What this paper adds</italic> The findings suggest that computer‐based interventions for English‐speaking, struggling readers can be effective. The effects extended beyond the targeted abilities, and a longer intervention was more effective than a shorter one. Apart from spelling, the mean reading and reading related standardised scores for children at the end of the intervention were above or just below 100. <italic>Implications for theory, policy or practice</italic> Computer‐based interventions can be used to support English‐speaking, struggling readers, and their effects can go beyond targeted abilities. The use of visual mnemonics and the development of the intervention programme over a number of years could have contributed to this success. The role of visual mnemonics as a help for struggling readers deserves further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Research in Reading is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=127241959
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/1467-9817.12107
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
        StartPage: 140
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Computer assisted reading instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Randomized controlled trials
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Phonetics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mnemonics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: School children
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Primary education
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: An evaluation of the effectiveness of a computer‐assisted reading intervention.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Messer, David
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Nash, Gilly
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 02
              Text: Feb2018
              Type: published
              Y: 2018
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 01410423
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 41
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Research in Reading
              Type: main
ResultId 1