The Impact of ‘Being There’: Psychiatric Staff Attitudes on the Use of Restraint.
Saved in:
| Title: | The Impact of ‘Being There’: Psychiatric Staff Attitudes on the Use of Restraint. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Dahan, Sagit, Levi, Galit, Behrbalk, Pnina, Bronstein, Israel, Hirschmann, Shmuel, Lev-Ran, Shaul |
| Source: | Psychiatric Quarterly. Mar2018, Vol. 89 Issue 1, p191-199. 9p. 3 Charts. |
| Subjects: | Psychotherapy patients, Restraint of patients, Psychiatrists, Mental health services, Punishment, Psychology |
| Abstract: | The practice of mechanically restraining psychiatric patients is constantly under debate, and staff attitudes are considered a central factor influencing restraining practices. The aim of this study was to explore associations between psychiatric staff members’ presence and participation in incidences of restraint and attitudes towards mechanical restraints. Methods: Staff members (psychiatrists, nurses, paramedical staff; |
| Copyright of Psychiatric Quarterly is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | The practice of mechanically restraining psychiatric patients is constantly under debate, and staff attitudes are considered a central factor influencing restraining practices. The aim of this study was to explore associations between psychiatric staff members’ presence and participation in incidences of restraint and attitudes towards mechanical restraints. Methods: Staff members (psychiatrists, nurses, paramedical staff; <italic>N</italic> = 143 working in a government psychiatric hospital in Israel) completed a questionnaire including personal information, participation in incidents of restraint and attitudes towards mechanical restraints. Items were categorized into the following categories: security and care; humiliation and offending; control; order; education and punishment. Results: Compared to those who were not present during restraint, staff members who were present agreed significantly less with statements indicating that restraints are humiliating and offending and agreed more with statements indicating that restraints are used primarily for security and care (<italic>p</italic> < .05). Among those present in incidences of restraint, staff members who physically participated in restraint agreed significantly more with statements indicating that restraints are a means for security, care and order, and less with statements indicating restraints are humiliating and offending, compared to those present but not physically participating in restraint (<italic>p</italic> < .05). Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of proximity of staff members to incidences of restraints. This may have implications in understanding the professional and social discourse concerning mechanical restraints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00332720 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11126-017-9524-9 |
