Evidence for instructions-based updating of task-set representations: the informed fadeout effect.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Evidence for instructions-based updating of task-set representations: the informed fadeout effect.
Authors: Pereg, Maayan, Meiran, Nachshon
Source: Psychological Research. May2018, Vol. 82 Issue 3, p549-569. 21p. 2 Diagrams, 5 Charts, 7 Graphs.
Subjects: Cognitive testing, Task performance, Context effects (Psychology), Passive learning, Intention
Abstract: The cognitive system can be updated rapidly and efficiently to maximize performance in cognitive tasks. This paper used a task-switching task to explore updating at the level of the plausible task-sets held for future performance. Previous research suggested a “fadeout effect”, performance improvement when moving from task-switching context to single-task context, yet this effect could reflect passive learning rather than intentional control. In a novel “informed fadeout paradigm”, one of two tasks was canceled for a certain number of trials and participants were informed or uninformed regarding task cancelation. The “informed fadeout effect” indicates better performance in the informed than uninformed fadeout after one informed trial had been executed. However, the results regarding the first trial were inconclusive. Possible underlying mechanisms are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Psychological Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 129344307
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Evidence for instructions-based updating of task-set representations: the informed fadeout effect.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pereg%2C+Maayan%22">Pereg, Maayan</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Meiran%2C+Nachshon%22">Meiran, Nachshon</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Psychological+Research%22">Psychological Research</searchLink>. May2018, Vol. 82 Issue 3, p549-569. 21p. 2 Diagrams, 5 Charts, 7 Graphs.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+testing%22">Cognitive testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Task+performance%22">Task performance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Context+effects+%28Psychology%29%22">Context effects (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Passive+learning%22">Passive learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intention%22">Intention</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The cognitive system can be updated rapidly and efficiently to maximize performance in cognitive tasks. This paper used a task-switching task to explore updating at the level of the plausible task-sets held for future performance. Previous research suggested a “fadeout effect”, performance improvement when moving from task-switching context to single-task context, yet this effect could reflect passive learning rather than intentional control. In a novel “informed fadeout paradigm”, one of two tasks was canceled for a certain number of trials and participants were informed or uninformed regarding task cancelation. The “informed fadeout effect” indicates better performance in the informed than uninformed fadeout after one informed trial had been executed. However, the results regarding the first trial were inconclusive. Possible underlying mechanisms are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Psychological Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=129344307
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s00426-017-0842-1
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 21
        StartPage: 549
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive testing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Task performance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Context effects (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Passive learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Intention
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Evidence for instructions-based updating of task-set representations: the informed fadeout effect.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pereg, Maayan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Meiran, Nachshon
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Text: May2018
              Type: published
              Y: 2018
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 03400727
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 82
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Psychological Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1