Economic implications of shared care arrangements. A primary care based study of patients in an inner city sample.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Economic implications of shared care arrangements. A primary care based study of patients in an inner city sample.
Authors: McCrone, P., Fitzpatrick, N. K., Mathieson, E., Chisholm, D., Nourmand, S.
Source: Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology. Jul2004, Vol. 39 Issue 7, p553-559. 7p.
Subjects: Primary care, Medical care, Health services accessibility, Medical care costs, People with mental illness, People with intellectual disabilities, Mental health
Abstract: Background: Providing care for people with serious and enduring mental health problems has been prioritised in a number of countries. It has been recognised that good liaison between primary and secondary care services is required for care to be effective. However, little is known about the resource implications of different levels of 'shared care'. The aim of this study is to compare service use and costs of different levels of shared care between primary and secondary care services. Method: Service use data were collected at baseline and one year later for participants with severe mental illness and costs were calculated. Levels of shared care were categorised into low, medium and high tertiles. Comparisons were made between the groups using multivariate analysis to control for participant characteristics. Results: Participants receiving a low level of shared care used residential care less and were less likely to have contacts with a psychiatrist or social worker than those receiving medium or high levels of shared care. Mean costs for a low level of shared care were significantly lower than for a medium level (a difference of pound 2606, 90% CI pound 452 to pound 4923), but not significantly lower than for a high level of shared care (difference of pound 1867, 90% CI- pound 287 to pound 3903). Conclusion: Different levels of shared care are associated with different patterns of service use, with greater resource consumption associated with a medium level of shared care. Further work is required to investigate the causal links between integrated care and service use and costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 13719583
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Economic implications of shared care arrangements. A primary care based study of patients in an inner city sample.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McCrone%2C+P%2E%22">McCrone, P.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fitzpatrick%2C+N%2E+K%2E%22">Fitzpatrick, N. K.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mathieson%2C+E%2E%22">Mathieson, E.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chisholm%2C+D%2E%22">Chisholm, D.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nourmand%2C+S%2E%22">Nourmand, S.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Social+Psychiatry+%26+Psychiatric+Epidemiology%22">Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology</searchLink>. Jul2004, Vol. 39 Issue 7, p553-559. 7p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Primary+care%22">Primary care</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+care%22">Medical care</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+services+accessibility%22">Health services accessibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+care+costs%22">Medical care costs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22People+with+mental+illness%22">People with mental illness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22People+with+intellectual+disabilities%22">People with intellectual disabilities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+health%22">Mental health</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: <bold>Background: </bold>Providing care for people with serious and enduring mental health problems has been prioritised in a number of countries. It has been recognised that good liaison between primary and secondary care services is required for care to be effective. However, little is known about the resource implications of different levels of 'shared care'. The aim of this study is to compare service use and costs of different levels of shared care between primary and secondary care services. <bold>Method: </bold>Service use data were collected at baseline and one year later for participants with severe mental illness and costs were calculated. Levels of shared care were categorised into low, medium and high tertiles. Comparisons were made between the groups using multivariate analysis to control for participant characteristics. <bold>Results: </bold>Participants receiving a low level of shared care used residential care less and were less likely to have contacts with a psychiatrist or social worker than those receiving medium or high levels of shared care. Mean costs for a low level of shared care were significantly lower than for a medium level (a difference of pound 2606, 90% CI pound 452 to pound 4923), but not significantly lower than for a high level of shared care (difference of pound 1867, 90% CI- pound 287 to pound 3903). <bold>Conclusion: </bold>Different levels of shared care are associated with different patterns of service use, with greater resource consumption associated with a medium level of shared care. Further work is required to investigate the causal links between integrated care and service use and costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=13719583
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s00127-004-0780-2
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 7
        StartPage: 553
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Primary care
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical care
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health services accessibility
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical care costs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: People with mental illness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: People with intellectual disabilities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mental health
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Economic implications of shared care arrangements. A primary care based study of patients in an inner city sample.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: McCrone, P.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fitzpatrick, N. K.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mathieson, E.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chisholm, D.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Nourmand, S.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: Jul2004
              Type: published
              Y: 2004
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09337954
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 39
            – Type: issue
              Value: 7
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology
              Type: main
ResultId 1