Dialectical behaviour therapy and 12‐step programmes for substance use disorder: A systematic review and meta‐analysis.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Dialectical behaviour therapy and 12‐step programmes for substance use disorder: A systematic review and meta‐analysis.
Authors: Giannelli, Ezechiele, Gold, Christian, Bieleninik, Lucja, Ghetti, Claire, Gelo, Omar C. G.
Source: Counselling & Psychotherapy Research. Sep2019, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p274-285. 12p. 1 Diagram, 2 Charts, 6 Graphs.
Subjects: Substance abuse treatment, Alcoholics Anonymous, Comparative studies, Confidence intervals, Meta-analysis, Support groups, Systematic reviews, Treatment programs, Dialectical behavior therapy, Treatment effectiveness, Descriptive statistics
Abstract: Background: Research on dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) or 12‐step programmes has shown inconclusive results; no systematic review has directly compared the two. Objectives: The goals of this meta‐analytic review were to assess if DBT is more effective than treatment as usual (TAU) and if DBT is more effective than 12‐step programmes (including twelve‐step facilitation [TSF] and self‐help groups like Alcoholics Anonymous) for substance use disorder (SUD). Methods: We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and extracted data on the following outcomes: reduction in substance use, retention in treatment, severity of substance dependence/abuse and severity of mental health symptoms. Studies involved adult (>18 years) women with SUD, according to DSM‐5 or the equivalent diagnoses in DSM‐IV. Three RCTs met the inclusion criteria and contained appropriate data for meta‐analysis (75 participants). Results: No significant effects of DBT have been found compared to 12‐step programmes. Comparing DBT with TAU, we found a beneficial short‐term (1 RCT, n = 12, SMD = −0.84; 95% CI [−1.64, −0.04]) and long‐term (2 RCTs, n = 29, SMD = −1.26; 95% CI [−2.13, −0.40]) effect of DBT on severity of substance use. Conclusions: Despite the limited evidence of the present review, contextual evidence supports DBT and 12‐step programmes. RCTs with larger sample sizes are needed to better elucidate the impact of both treatments on SUD and facilitate the comparison between DBT and 12 steps programmes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Counselling & Psychotherapy Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 137376538
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Dialectical behaviour therapy and 12‐step programmes for substance use disorder: A systematic review and meta‐analysis.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Giannelli%2C+Ezechiele%22">Giannelli, Ezechiele</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gold%2C+Christian%22">Gold, Christian</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bieleninik%2C+Lucja%22">Bieleninik, Lucja</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ghetti%2C+Claire%22">Ghetti, Claire</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gelo%2C+Omar+C%2E+G%2E%22">Gelo, Omar C. G.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Counselling+%26+Psychotherapy+Research%22">Counselling & Psychotherapy Research</searchLink>. Sep2019, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p274-285. 12p. 1 Diagram, 2 Charts, 6 Graphs.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Substance+abuse+treatment%22">Substance abuse treatment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Alcoholics+Anonymous%22">Alcoholics Anonymous</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+studies%22">Comparative studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Meta-analysis%22">Meta-analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Support+groups%22">Support groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systematic+reviews%22">Systematic reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Treatment+programs%22">Treatment programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Dialectical+behavior+therapy%22">Dialectical behavior therapy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Treatment+effectiveness%22">Treatment effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: Research on dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) or 12‐step programmes has shown inconclusive results; no systematic review has directly compared the two. Objectives: The goals of this meta‐analytic review were to assess if DBT is more effective than treatment as usual (TAU) and if DBT is more effective than 12‐step programmes (including twelve‐step facilitation [TSF] and self‐help groups like Alcoholics Anonymous) for substance use disorder (SUD). Methods: We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and extracted data on the following outcomes: reduction in substance use, retention in treatment, severity of substance dependence/abuse and severity of mental health symptoms. Studies involved adult (>18 years) women with SUD, according to DSM‐5 or the equivalent diagnoses in DSM‐IV. Three RCTs met the inclusion criteria and contained appropriate data for meta‐analysis (75 participants). Results: No significant effects of DBT have been found compared to 12‐step programmes. Comparing DBT with TAU, we found a beneficial short‐term (1 RCT, n = 12, SMD = −0.84; 95% CI [−1.64, −0.04]) and long‐term (2 RCTs, n = 29, SMD = −1.26; 95% CI [−2.13, −0.40]) effect of DBT on severity of substance use. Conclusions: Despite the limited evidence of the present review, contextual evidence supports DBT and 12‐step programmes. RCTs with larger sample sizes are needed to better elucidate the impact of both treatments on SUD and facilitate the comparison between DBT and 12 steps programmes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Counselling & Psychotherapy Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=137376538
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/capr.12228
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 12
        StartPage: 274
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Substance abuse treatment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Alcoholics Anonymous
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Meta-analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Support groups
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Treatment programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Dialectical behavior therapy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Treatment effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Dialectical behaviour therapy and 12‐step programmes for substance use disorder: A systematic review and meta‐analysis.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Giannelli, Ezechiele
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gold, Christian
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bieleninik, Lucja
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ghetti, Claire
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gelo, Omar C. G.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2019
              Type: published
              Y: 2019
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 14733145
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 19
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1