The poverty of contractarian moral education.
Saved in:
| Title: | The poverty of contractarian moral education. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Clayton, Matthew, Stevens, David |
| Source: | Journal of Moral Education. Dec2019, Vol. 48 Issue 4, p501-514. 14p. |
| Subjects: | Poverty, Contractarianism (Ethics), Moral education, Theory of Moral Education, A (Book), Hand, Michael R. |
| Abstract: | In A Theory of Moral Education, Michael Hand claims that a directive moral education that seeks to persuade children that a particular conception of contractarian morality is justified can be undertaken without falling foul of the requirement not to indoctrinate. In this article, we set out a series of challenges to Hand's argument. First, we argue that Hand's focus on 'reasonable disagreement' regarding the status of a moral conception is a red-herring. Second, we argue that the endorsement of moral contractarianism and the prohibition on indoctrination pull in different directions: if contractarianism is sound, then teachers or governments should be less worried about indoctrination than Hand suggests. Third, we argue that moral contractarianism is mistaken; teachers should look elsewhere for guidance on the moral norms and principles towards which they should direct their pupils. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Moral Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 139082061 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The poverty of contractarian moral education. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Clayton%2C+Matthew%22">Clayton, Matthew</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stevens%2C+David%22">Stevens, David</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Moral+Education%22">Journal of Moral Education</searchLink>. Dec2019, Vol. 48 Issue 4, p501-514. 14p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Poverty%22">Poverty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Contractarianism+%28Ethics%29%22">Contractarianism (Ethics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Moral+education%22">Moral education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Theory+of+Moral+Education%2C+A+%28Book%29%22">Theory of Moral Education, A (Book)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hand%2C+Michael+R%2E%22">Hand, Michael R.</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: In A Theory of Moral Education, Michael Hand claims that a directive moral education that seeks to persuade children that a particular conception of contractarian morality is justified can be undertaken without falling foul of the requirement not to indoctrinate. In this article, we set out a series of challenges to Hand's argument. First, we argue that Hand's focus on 'reasonable disagreement' regarding the status of a moral conception is a red-herring. Second, we argue that the endorsement of moral contractarianism and the prohibition on indoctrination pull in different directions: if contractarianism is sound, then teachers or governments should be less worried about indoctrination than Hand suggests. Third, we argue that moral contractarianism is mistaken; teachers should look elsewhere for guidance on the moral norms and principles towards which they should direct their pupils. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Moral Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=139082061 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/03057240.2019.1576123 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 14 StartPage: 501 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Poverty Type: general – SubjectFull: Contractarianism (Ethics) Type: general – SubjectFull: Moral education Type: general – SubjectFull: Theory of Moral Education, A (Book) Type: general – SubjectFull: Hand, Michael R. Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The poverty of contractarian moral education. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Clayton, Matthew – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Stevens, David IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Text: Dec2019 Type: published Y: 2019 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 03057240 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 48 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Moral Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |