A deep learning framework for neuroscience.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A deep learning framework for neuroscience.
Authors: Richards, Blake A. (AUTHOR), Lillicrap, Timothy P. (AUTHOR), Beaudoin, Philippe (AUTHOR), Bengio, Yoshua (AUTHOR), Bogacz, Rafal (AUTHOR), Christensen, Amelia (AUTHOR), Clopath, Claudia (AUTHOR), Costa, Rui Ponte (AUTHOR), de Berker, Archy (AUTHOR), Ganguli, Surya (AUTHOR), Gillon, Colleen J. (AUTHOR), Hafner, Danijar (AUTHOR), Kepecs, Adam (AUTHOR), Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus (AUTHOR), Latham, Peter (AUTHOR), Lindsay, Grace W. (AUTHOR), Miller, Kenneth D. (AUTHOR), Naud, Richard (AUTHOR), Pack, Christopher C. (AUTHOR), Poirazi, Panayiota (AUTHOR)
Source: Nature Neuroscience. Nov2019, Vol. 22 Issue 11, p1761-1770. 10p. 1 Color Photograph, 4 Diagrams.
Abstract: Systems neuroscience seeks explanations for how the brain implements a wide variety of perceptual, cognitive and motor tasks. Conversely, artificial intelligence attempts to design computational systems based on the tasks they will have to solve. In artificial neural networks, the three components specified by design are the objective functions, the learning rules and the architectures. With the growing success of deep learning, which utilizes brain-inspired architectures, these three designed components have increasingly become central to how we model, engineer and optimize complex artificial learning systems. Here we argue that a greater focus on these components would also benefit systems neuroscience. We give examples of how this optimization-based framework can drive theoretical and experimental progress in neuroscience. We contend that this principled perspective on systems neuroscience will help to generate more rapid progress. A deep network is best understood in terms of components used to design it—objective functions, architecture and learning rules—rather than unit-by-unit computation. Richards et al. argue that this inspires fruitful approaches to systems neuroscience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Nature Neuroscience is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:Systems neuroscience seeks explanations for how the brain implements a wide variety of perceptual, cognitive and motor tasks. Conversely, artificial intelligence attempts to design computational systems based on the tasks they will have to solve. In artificial neural networks, the three components specified by design are the objective functions, the learning rules and the architectures. With the growing success of deep learning, which utilizes brain-inspired architectures, these three designed components have increasingly become central to how we model, engineer and optimize complex artificial learning systems. Here we argue that a greater focus on these components would also benefit systems neuroscience. We give examples of how this optimization-based framework can drive theoretical and experimental progress in neuroscience. We contend that this principled perspective on systems neuroscience will help to generate more rapid progress. A deep network is best understood in terms of components used to design it—objective functions, architecture and learning rules—rather than unit-by-unit computation. Richards et al. argue that this inspires fruitful approaches to systems neuroscience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:10976256
DOI:10.1038/s41593-019-0520-2