View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Outcome measurement instruments for peripheral vascular malformations and an assessment of the measurement properties: a systematic review.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Outcome measurement instruments for peripheral vascular malformations and an assessment of the measurement properties: a systematic review.
Authors: Horbach, Sophie E. R. (AUTHOR), Rongen, Amber P. M. (AUTHOR), Elbers, Roy G. (AUTHOR), van der Horst, Chantal M. A. M. (AUTHOR), Prinsen, Cecilia A. C. (AUTHOR), Spuls, Phyllis I. (AUTHOR), Collaborators OVAMA consensus group (AUTHOR), Blei, F. (AUTHOR), van der Vleuten, C. J. M. (AUTHOR), Frieden, I. J. (AUTHOR), Richter, G. T. (AUTHOR), Tan, S. T. (AUTHOR), Muir, T. (AUTHOR), Penington, A. J. (AUTHOR), Boon, L. M. (AUTHOR)
Source: Quality of Life Research. Jan2020, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p1-17. 17p. 2 Diagrams, 5 Charts.
Subjects: Meta-analysis, Valuation of real property, Human abnormalities, Lymphatic diseases, Arteriovenous malformation
Abstract: Purpose: The Outcome measures for vascular malformation (OVAMA) group reached consensus on the core outcome domains for the core outcome set (COS) for peripheral vascular malformations (venous, lymphatic and arteriovenous malformations). However, it is unclear which instruments should be used to measure these domains. Therefore, our aims were to identify all outcome measurement instruments available for vascular malformations, and to evaluate their measurement properties.Methods: With the first literature search, we identified outcomes and instruments previously used in prospective studies on vascular malformations. A second search yielded studies on measurement properties of patient- and physician-reported instruments that were either developed for vascular malformations, or used in prospective studies. If the latter instruments were not specifically validated for vascular malformations, we performed a third search for studies on measurement properties in clinically similar diseases (vascular or lymphatic diseases and benign tumors). We assessed the methodological quality of these studies following the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments methodology, and evaluated the quality of the measurement properties.Results: The first search yielded 27 studies, none using disease-specific instruments. The second and third search included 22 development and/or validation studies, concerning six instruments. Only the Lymphatic Malformation Function Instrument was developed specifically for vascular malformations. Other instruments were generic QoL instruments developed and/or partly validated for clinically similar diseases.Conclusions: Additional research on measurement properties is needed to assess which instruments may be included in the COS. This review informs the instrument selection and/or the development of new instruments.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, 42017056242. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Quality of Life Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 141210918
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Outcome measurement instruments for peripheral vascular malformations and an assessment of the measurement properties: a systematic review.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Horbach%2C+Sophie+E%2E+R%2E%22">Horbach, Sophie E. R.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rongen%2C+Amber+P%2E+M%2E%22">Rongen, Amber P. M.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Elbers%2C+Roy+G%2E%22">Elbers, Roy G.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van+der+Horst%2C+Chantal+M%2E+A%2E+M%2E%22">van der Horst, Chantal M. A. M.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Prinsen%2C+Cecilia+A%2E+C%2E%22">Prinsen, Cecilia A. C.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Spuls%2C+Phyllis+I%2E%22">Spuls, Phyllis I.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Collaborators+OVAMA+consensus+group%22">Collaborators OVAMA consensus group</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Blei%2C+F%2E%22">Blei, F.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van+der+Vleuten%2C+C%2E+J%2E+M%2E%22">van der Vleuten, C. J. M.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Frieden%2C+I%2E+J%2E%22">Frieden, I. J.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Richter%2C+G%2E+T%2E%22">Richter, G. T.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tan%2C+S%2E+T%2E%22">Tan, S. T.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Muir%2C+T%2E%22">Muir, T.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Penington%2C+A%2E+J%2E%22">Penington, A. J.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Boon%2C+L%2E+M%2E%22">Boon, L. M.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Quality+of+Life+Research%22">Quality of Life Research</searchLink>. Jan2020, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p1-17. 17p. 2 Diagrams, 5 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Meta-analysis%22">Meta-analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Valuation+of+real+property%22">Valuation of real property</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+abnormalities%22">Human abnormalities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lymphatic+diseases%22">Lymphatic diseases</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Arteriovenous+malformation%22">Arteriovenous malformation</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: <bold>Purpose: </bold>The Outcome measures for vascular malformation (OVAMA) group reached consensus on the core outcome domains for the core outcome set (COS) for peripheral vascular malformations (venous, lymphatic and arteriovenous malformations). However, it is unclear which instruments should be used to measure these domains. Therefore, our aims were to identify all outcome measurement instruments available for vascular malformations, and to evaluate their measurement properties.<bold>Methods: </bold>With the first literature search, we identified outcomes and instruments previously used in prospective studies on vascular malformations. A second search yielded studies on measurement properties of patient- and physician-reported instruments that were either developed for vascular malformations, or used in prospective studies. If the latter instruments were not specifically validated for vascular malformations, we performed a third search for studies on measurement properties in clinically similar diseases (vascular or lymphatic diseases and benign tumors). We assessed the methodological quality of these studies following the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments methodology, and evaluated the quality of the measurement properties.<bold>Results: </bold>The first search yielded 27 studies, none using disease-specific instruments. The second and third search included 22 development and/or validation studies, concerning six instruments. Only the Lymphatic Malformation Function Instrument was developed specifically for vascular malformations. Other instruments were generic QoL instruments developed and/or partly validated for clinically similar diseases.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Additional research on measurement properties is needed to assess which instruments may be included in the COS. This review informs the instrument selection and/or the development of new instruments.<bold>Systematic Review Registration: </bold>PROSPERO, 42017056242. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Quality of Life Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=141210918
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s11136-019-02301-x
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 17
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Meta-analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Valuation of real property
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Human abnormalities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Lymphatic diseases
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Arteriovenous malformation
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Outcome measurement instruments for peripheral vascular malformations and an assessment of the measurement properties: a systematic review.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Horbach, Sophie E. R.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rongen, Amber P. M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Elbers, Roy G.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van der Horst, Chantal M. A. M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Prinsen, Cecilia A. C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Spuls, Phyllis I.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Collaborators OVAMA consensus group
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Blei, F.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van der Vleuten, C. J. M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Frieden, I. J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Richter, G. T.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tan, S. T.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Muir, T.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Penington, A. J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Boon, L. M.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: Jan2020
              Type: published
              Y: 2020
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09629343
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 29
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Quality of Life Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1