Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication.
Authors: Walter, Kathryn V., Conroy-Beam, Daniel, Buss, David M., Asao, Kelly, Sorokowska, Agnieszka, Sorokowski, Piotr, Aavik, Toivo, Akello, Grace, Alhabahba, Mohammad Madallh, Alm, Charlotte, Amjad, Naumana, Anjum, Afifa, Atama, Chiemezie S., Atamtürk Duyar, Derya, Ayebare, Richard, Batres, Carlota, Bendixen, Mons, Bensafia, Aicha, Bizumic, Boris, Boussena, Mahmoud
Source: Psychological Science (0956-7976). Apr2020, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p408-423. 16p. 4 Charts, 4 Graphs.
Subjects: Interpersonal attraction, Gender differences (Psychology), Evolutionary psychology
Abstract: Considerable research has examined human mate preferences across cultures, finding universal sex differences in preferences for attractiveness and resources as well as sources of systematic cultural variation. Two competing perspectives—an evolutionary psychological perspective and a biosocial role perspective—offer alternative explanations for these findings. However, the original data on which each perspective relies are decades old, and the literature is fraught with conflicting methods, analyses, results, and conclusions. Using a new 45-country sample (N = 14,399), we attempted to replicate classic studies and test both the evolutionary and biosocial role perspectives. Support for universal sex differences in preferences remains robust: Men, more than women, prefer attractive, young mates, and women, more than men, prefer older mates with financial prospects. Cross-culturally, both sexes have mates closer to their own ages as gender equality increases. Beyond age of partner, neither pathogen prevalence nor gender equality robustly predicted sex differences or preferences across countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Psychological Science (0956-7976) is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 142774793
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Walter%2C+Kathryn+V%2E%22">Walter, Kathryn V.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Conroy-Beam%2C+Daniel%22">Conroy-Beam, Daniel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Buss%2C+David+M%2E%22">Buss, David M.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Asao%2C+Kelly%22">Asao, Kelly</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sorokowska%2C+Agnieszka%22">Sorokowska, Agnieszka</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sorokowski%2C+Piotr%22">Sorokowski, Piotr</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Aavik%2C+Toivo%22">Aavik, Toivo</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Akello%2C+Grace%22">Akello, Grace</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Alhabahba%2C+Mohammad+Madallh%22">Alhabahba, Mohammad Madallh</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Alm%2C+Charlotte%22">Alm, Charlotte</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Amjad%2C+Naumana%22">Amjad, Naumana</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Anjum%2C+Afifa%22">Anjum, Afifa</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Atama%2C+Chiemezie+S%2E%22">Atama, Chiemezie S.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Atamtürk+Duyar%2C+Derya%22">Atamtürk Duyar, Derya</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ayebare%2C+Richard%22">Ayebare, Richard</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Batres%2C+Carlota%22">Batres, Carlota</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bendixen%2C+Mons%22">Bendixen, Mons</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bensafia%2C+Aicha%22">Bensafia, Aicha</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bizumic%2C+Boris%22">Bizumic, Boris</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Boussena%2C+Mahmoud%22">Boussena, Mahmoud</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Psychological+Science+%280956-7976%29%22">Psychological Science (0956-7976)</searchLink>. Apr2020, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p408-423. 16p. 4 Charts, 4 Graphs.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interpersonal+attraction%22">Interpersonal attraction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gender+differences+%28Psychology%29%22">Gender differences (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evolutionary+psychology%22">Evolutionary psychology</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Considerable research has examined human mate preferences across cultures, finding universal sex differences in preferences for attractiveness and resources as well as sources of systematic cultural variation. Two competing perspectives—an evolutionary psychological perspective and a biosocial role perspective—offer alternative explanations for these findings. However, the original data on which each perspective relies are decades old, and the literature is fraught with conflicting methods, analyses, results, and conclusions. Using a new 45-country sample (N = 14,399), we attempted to replicate classic studies and test both the evolutionary and biosocial role perspectives. Support for universal sex differences in preferences remains robust: Men, more than women, prefer attractive, young mates, and women, more than men, prefer older mates with financial prospects. Cross-culturally, both sexes have mates closer to their own ages as gender equality increases. Beyond age of partner, neither pathogen prevalence nor gender equality robustly predicted sex differences or preferences across countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Psychological Science (0956-7976) is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=142774793
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/0956797620904154
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 16
        StartPage: 408
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Interpersonal attraction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Gender differences (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evolutionary psychology
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Walter, Kathryn V.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Conroy-Beam, Daniel
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Buss, David M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Asao, Kelly
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sorokowska, Agnieszka
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sorokowski, Piotr
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Aavik, Toivo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Akello, Grace
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Alhabahba, Mohammad Madallh
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Alm, Charlotte
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Amjad, Naumana
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Anjum, Afifa
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Atama, Chiemezie S.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Atamtürk Duyar, Derya
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ayebare, Richard
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Batres, Carlota
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bendixen, Mons
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bensafia, Aicha
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bizumic, Boris
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Boussena, Mahmoud
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 04
              Text: Apr2020
              Type: published
              Y: 2020
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09567976
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 31
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Psychological Science (0956-7976)
              Type: main
ResultId 1