Not all transcendence is created equal: Distinguishing ontological, phenomenological, and subjective beliefs about transcendence.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Not all transcendence is created equal: Distinguishing ontological, phenomenological, and subjective beliefs about transcendence.
Authors: Callaway, Kutter (AUTHOR), Schnitker, Sarah (AUTHOR), Gilbertson, Madison (AUTHOR)
Source: Philosophical Psychology. May2020, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p479-510. 32p.
Subjects: Transcendence (Philosophy), Belief & doubt, Psychologists, Philosophy, Self, Cognition
Abstract: Psychologists have generated numerous measures designed to capture the "spiritual," "religious," and "transcendent" structures of human cognition, emotion, and behavior. Researchers often identify transcendence as the unifying element that brings together these constructs, but the concept itself lacks precision. Namely, they confound the distinctions between the different kinds of content that populate what is actually a diverse and dynamic set of belief systems regarding transcendence, reducing transcendence to its functional outputs. This paper outlines a more robust theoretical framework by drawing upon the resources of theology and philosophy. The aim is to describe a model that clarifies both the content and function of a variety of transcendent belief systems, which includes at least three clearly distinct but interrelated domains: ontological transcendence, which conceives of reality in terms of supernatural categories of being; phenomenological transcendence, which focuses on traversing the divide between the self and others or the self and the world; and subjective transcendence, which has in view the ever-shifting boundary that constitutes the mundane self, the crossing of which is always yet to come. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Philosophical Psychology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 143116035
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Not all transcendence is created equal: Distinguishing ontological, phenomenological, and subjective beliefs about transcendence.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Callaway%2C+Kutter%22">Callaway, Kutter</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Schnitker%2C+Sarah%22">Schnitker, Sarah</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gilbertson%2C+Madison%22">Gilbertson, Madison</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Philosophical+Psychology%22">Philosophical Psychology</searchLink>. May2020, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p479-510. 32p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Transcendence+%28Philosophy%29%22">Transcendence (Philosophy)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Belief+%26+doubt%22">Belief & doubt</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychologists%22">Psychologists</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Philosophy%22">Philosophy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self%22">Self</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognition%22">Cognition</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Psychologists have generated numerous measures designed to capture the "spiritual," "religious," and "transcendent" structures of human cognition, emotion, and behavior. Researchers often identify transcendence as the unifying element that brings together these constructs, but the concept itself lacks precision. Namely, they confound the distinctions between the different kinds of content that populate what is actually a diverse and dynamic set of belief systems regarding transcendence, reducing transcendence to its functional outputs. This paper outlines a more robust theoretical framework by drawing upon the resources of theology and philosophy. The aim is to describe a model that clarifies both the content and function of a variety of transcendent belief systems, which includes at least three clearly distinct but interrelated domains: ontological transcendence, which conceives of reality in terms of supernatural categories of being; phenomenological transcendence, which focuses on traversing the divide between the self and others or the self and the world; and subjective transcendence, which has in view the ever-shifting boundary that constitutes the mundane self, the crossing of which is always yet to come. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Philosophical Psychology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=143116035
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/09515089.2020.1743254
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 32
        StartPage: 479
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Transcendence (Philosophy)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Belief & doubt
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychologists
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Philosophy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognition
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Not all transcendence is created equal: Distinguishing ontological, phenomenological, and subjective beliefs about transcendence.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Callaway, Kutter
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Schnitker, Sarah
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gilbertson, Madison
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Text: May2020
              Type: published
              Y: 2020
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09515089
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 33
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Philosophical Psychology
              Type: main
ResultId 1