Not all transcendence is created equal: Distinguishing ontological, phenomenological, and subjective beliefs about transcendence.
Saved in:
| Title: | Not all transcendence is created equal: Distinguishing ontological, phenomenological, and subjective beliefs about transcendence. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Callaway, Kutter (AUTHOR), Schnitker, Sarah (AUTHOR), Gilbertson, Madison (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Philosophical Psychology. May2020, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p479-510. 32p. |
| Subjects: | Transcendence (Philosophy), Belief & doubt, Psychologists, Philosophy, Self, Cognition |
| Abstract: | Psychologists have generated numerous measures designed to capture the "spiritual," "religious," and "transcendent" structures of human cognition, emotion, and behavior. Researchers often identify transcendence as the unifying element that brings together these constructs, but the concept itself lacks precision. Namely, they confound the distinctions between the different kinds of content that populate what is actually a diverse and dynamic set of belief systems regarding transcendence, reducing transcendence to its functional outputs. This paper outlines a more robust theoretical framework by drawing upon the resources of theology and philosophy. The aim is to describe a model that clarifies both the content and function of a variety of transcendent belief systems, which includes at least three clearly distinct but interrelated domains: ontological transcendence, which conceives of reality in terms of supernatural categories of being; phenomenological transcendence, which focuses on traversing the divide between the self and others or the self and the world; and subjective transcendence, which has in view the ever-shifting boundary that constitutes the mundane self, the crossing of which is always yet to come. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Philosophical Psychology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 143116035 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Not all transcendence is created equal: Distinguishing ontological, phenomenological, and subjective beliefs about transcendence. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Callaway%2C+Kutter%22">Callaway, Kutter</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Schnitker%2C+Sarah%22">Schnitker, Sarah</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gilbertson%2C+Madison%22">Gilbertson, Madison</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Philosophical+Psychology%22">Philosophical Psychology</searchLink>. May2020, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p479-510. 32p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Transcendence+%28Philosophy%29%22">Transcendence (Philosophy)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Belief+%26+doubt%22">Belief & doubt</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychologists%22">Psychologists</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Philosophy%22">Philosophy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self%22">Self</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognition%22">Cognition</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Psychologists have generated numerous measures designed to capture the "spiritual," "religious," and "transcendent" structures of human cognition, emotion, and behavior. Researchers often identify transcendence as the unifying element that brings together these constructs, but the concept itself lacks precision. Namely, they confound the distinctions between the different kinds of content that populate what is actually a diverse and dynamic set of belief systems regarding transcendence, reducing transcendence to its functional outputs. This paper outlines a more robust theoretical framework by drawing upon the resources of theology and philosophy. The aim is to describe a model that clarifies both the content and function of a variety of transcendent belief systems, which includes at least three clearly distinct but interrelated domains: ontological transcendence, which conceives of reality in terms of supernatural categories of being; phenomenological transcendence, which focuses on traversing the divide between the self and others or the self and the world; and subjective transcendence, which has in view the ever-shifting boundary that constitutes the mundane self, the crossing of which is always yet to come. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Philosophical Psychology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=143116035 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/09515089.2020.1743254 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 32 StartPage: 479 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Transcendence (Philosophy) Type: general – SubjectFull: Belief & doubt Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychologists Type: general – SubjectFull: Philosophy Type: general – SubjectFull: Self Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognition Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Not all transcendence is created equal: Distinguishing ontological, phenomenological, and subjective beliefs about transcendence. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Callaway, Kutter – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Schnitker, Sarah – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gilbertson, Madison IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Text: May2020 Type: published Y: 2020 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 09515089 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 33 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Philosophical Psychology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |