The Prevalence of Local Criminal Justice Practices.
Saved in:
| Title: | The Prevalence of Local Criminal Justice Practices. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Lattimore, Pamela K., Tueller, Stephen, Levin-Rector, Alison, Witwer, Amanda |
| Source: | Federal Probation. Jun2020, Vol. 84 Issue 1, p28-37. 10p. |
| Subjects: | Criminal justice system, Judges, Criminal justice policy |
| Abstract: | Justice system includes law enforcement agencies, prosecutors and defenders, courts, jails, and pretrial services and is the gateway to justice in the United States. Interestingly, video conference and problem-solving courts were most widely reported among mid-size (100,001-250,000) jurisdictions rather than among the smallest or largest jurisdictions. Overall, these results indicate that trial, defense, and court practices tended to be implemented together while pretrial and jail practices tended to be implemented together, with only a few individual practices being associated with both factors (as indicated by factor loadings > .3 on both factors, a condition known as cross-loading). Jails were also somewhat likely to report using jail population management tools such as dashboards (33 percent) or to have jail population coordinators or teams (31 percent). [Extracted from the article] |
| Copyright of Federal Probation is the property of Superintendent of Documents and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 144452256 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Prevalence of Local Criminal Justice Practices. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lattimore%2C+Pamela+K%2E%22">Lattimore, Pamela K.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tueller%2C+Stephen%22">Tueller, Stephen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Levin-Rector%2C+Alison%22">Levin-Rector, Alison</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Witwer%2C+Amanda%22">Witwer, Amanda</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Federal+Probation%22">Federal Probation</searchLink>. Jun2020, Vol. 84 Issue 1, p28-37. 10p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Criminal+justice+system%22">Criminal justice system</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Judges%22">Judges</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Criminal+justice+policy%22">Criminal justice policy</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Justice system includes law enforcement agencies, prosecutors and defenders, courts, jails, and pretrial services and is the gateway to justice in the United States. Interestingly, video conference and problem-solving courts were most widely reported among mid-size (100,001-250,000) jurisdictions rather than among the smallest or largest jurisdictions. Overall, these results indicate that trial, defense, and court practices tended to be implemented together while pretrial and jail practices tended to be implemented together, with only a few individual practices being associated with both factors (as indicated by factor loadings > .3 on both factors, a condition known as cross-loading). Jails were also somewhat likely to report using jail population management tools such as dashboards (33 percent) or to have jail population coordinators or teams (31 percent). [Extracted from the article] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Federal Probation is the property of Superintendent of Documents and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=144452256 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 10 StartPage: 28 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Criminal justice system Type: general – SubjectFull: Judges Type: general – SubjectFull: Criminal justice policy Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Prevalence of Local Criminal Justice Practices. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lattimore, Pamela K. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Tueller, Stephen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Levin-Rector, Alison – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Witwer, Amanda IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Text: Jun2020 Type: published Y: 2020 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00149128 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 84 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Federal Probation Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
