Cost of Tuberculosis Therapy Directly Observed on Video for Health Departments and Patients in New York City; San Francisco, California; and Rhode Island (2017–2018).
Saved in:
| Title: | Cost of Tuberculosis Therapy Directly Observed on Video for Health Departments and Patients in New York City; San Francisco, California; and Rhode Island (2017–2018). |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Beeler Asay, Garrett R. (AUTHOR), Lam, Chee Kin (AUTHOR), Stewart, Brock (AUTHOR), Mangan, Joan M. (AUTHOR), Romo, Laura (AUTHOR), Marks, Suzanne M. (AUTHOR), Morris, Sapna Bamrah (AUTHOR), Gummo, Caroline L. (AUTHOR), Keh, Chris E. (AUTHOR), Hill, Andrew N. (AUTHOR), Thomas, Anila (AUTHOR), Macaraig, Michelle (AUTHOR), St John, Kristen (AUTHOR), J. Ampie, Teresita (AUTHOR), Chuck, Christine (AUTHOR), Burzynski, Joseph (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | American Journal of Public Health. Nov2020, Vol. 110 Issue 11, p1696-1703. 8p. |
| Subjects: | Health boards, Tuberculosis treatment, Directly observed therapy, Videoconferencing, Tuberculosis patients, Medical care costs |
| Abstract: | Objectives. To assess costs of video and traditional in-person directly observed therapy (DOT) for tuberculosis (TB) treatment to health departments and patients in New York City, Rhode Island, and San Francisco, California. Methods. We collected health department costs for video DOT (VDOT; live and recorded), and in-person DOT (field- and clinic-based). Time–motion surveys estimated provider time and cost. A separate survey collected patient costs. We used a regression model to estimate cost by DOT type. Results. Between August 2017 and June 2018, 343 DOT sessions were captured from 225 patients; 87 completed a survey. Patient costs were lowest for VDOT live ($1.01) and highest for clinic DOT ($34.53). The societal (health department + patient) costs of VDOT live and recorded ($6.65 and $12.64, respectively) were less than field and clinic DOT ($21.40 and $46.11, respectively). VDOT recorded health department cost was not statistically different from field DOT cost in Rhode Island. Conclusions. Among the 4 different modalities, both types of VDOT were associated with lower societal costs when compared with traditional forms of DOT. Public Health Implications. VDOT was associated with lower costs from the societal perspective and may reduce public health costs when TB incidence is high. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of American Journal of Public Health is the property of American Public Health Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Objectives. To assess costs of video and traditional in-person directly observed therapy (DOT) for tuberculosis (TB) treatment to health departments and patients in New York City, Rhode Island, and San Francisco, California. Methods. We collected health department costs for video DOT (VDOT; live and recorded), and in-person DOT (field- and clinic-based). Time–motion surveys estimated provider time and cost. A separate survey collected patient costs. We used a regression model to estimate cost by DOT type. Results. Between August 2017 and June 2018, 343 DOT sessions were captured from 225 patients; 87 completed a survey. Patient costs were lowest for VDOT live ($1.01) and highest for clinic DOT ($34.53). The societal (health department + patient) costs of VDOT live and recorded ($6.65 and $12.64, respectively) were less than field and clinic DOT ($21.40 and $46.11, respectively). VDOT recorded health department cost was not statistically different from field DOT cost in Rhode Island. Conclusions. Among the 4 different modalities, both types of VDOT were associated with lower societal costs when compared with traditional forms of DOT. Public Health Implications. VDOT was associated with lower costs from the societal perspective and may reduce public health costs when TB incidence is high. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00900036 |
| DOI: | 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305877 |
