View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Nasal Bone Fractures: Differences Amongst Sub-Specialty Consultants.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Nasal Bone Fractures: Differences Amongst Sub-Specialty Consultants.
Authors: Cohn, Jason E., Othman, Sammy, Toscano, Michael, Shokri, Tom, Bloom, Jason D., Zwillenberg, Seth
Source: Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. Nov2020, Vol. 129 Issue 11, p1120-1128. 9p.
Subjects: Chi-squared test, Fisher exact test, Medical consultants, Medical records, Medical specialties & specialists, Nasal bone, Otolaryngologists, Surgery practice, Plastic surgery, Occupational roles, Treatment effectiveness, Retrospective studies, Descriptive statistics, Acquisition of data methodology, Mann Whitney U Test
Abstract: Background: Nasal fractures constitute the largest proportion of facial trauma each year, however, there is no consensus management. In this study, we investingated the role of the consultant and the functional and aesthetic outcomes of procedures performed to address nasal bone fractures. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who sustained nasal bone fractures was conducted from 8/1/14 through 1/23/18. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-squared testing and Fisher's exact test, where appropriate, while continuous variables were compared using Mann–Whitney U testing. Results: During the study period, 136 patients met inclusion criteria for full analysis. The mean age of this cohort was 47.6 ± 20.2 years with the majority identifying as African–American (53.7%) and male (67.2%). Otolaryngologists were significantly more likely to assess pre-operative nasal obstruction (100%) compared to plastic surgeons (24.1%) (P <.001). Otolaryngology elected operative management (53.3%) at a significantly higher rate than plastic surgery (24.1%) (P =.005). Additionally, otolaryngology was significantly more likely to manage patients in an outpatient setting (91.2%), whereas plastic surgery more commonly performed inpatient management (57.1%) (P =.006). Plastic surgery averaged a significantly shorter amount of time from presentation to operative management (7.3 ± 10.7 days) compared to otolaryngology (20 ± 27.7) (P =.019). Consulting service was not associated with a need for revision surgery. Conclusions: Consultants across subspecialties differ in the management of nasal bone trauma. A more standardized approach is warranted by all individuals involved in the care of maxillofacial trauma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 146871568
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Nasal Bone Fractures: Differences Amongst Sub-Specialty Consultants.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Cohn%2C+Jason+E%2E%22&quot;&gt;Cohn, Jason E.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Othman%2C+Sammy%22&quot;&gt;Othman, Sammy&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Toscano%2C+Michael%22&quot;&gt;Toscano, Michael&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Shokri%2C+Tom%22&quot;&gt;Shokri, Tom&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Bloom%2C+Jason+D%2E%22&quot;&gt;Bloom, Jason D.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Zwillenberg%2C+Seth%22&quot;&gt;Zwillenberg, Seth&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22Annals+of+Otology%2C+Rhinology+%26+Laryngology%22&quot;&gt;Annals of Otology, Rhinology &amp; Laryngology&lt;/searchLink&gt;. Nov2020, Vol. 129 Issue 11, p1120-1128. 9p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Chi-squared+test%22&quot;&gt;Chi-squared test&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Fisher+exact+test%22&quot;&gt;Fisher exact test&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Medical+consultants%22&quot;&gt;Medical consultants&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Medical+records%22&quot;&gt;Medical records&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Medical+specialties+%26+specialists%22&quot;&gt;Medical specialties &amp; specialists&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Nasal+bone%22&quot;&gt;Nasal bone&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Otolaryngologists%22&quot;&gt;Otolaryngologists&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Surgery+practice%22&quot;&gt;Surgery practice&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Plastic+surgery%22&quot;&gt;Plastic surgery&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Occupational+roles%22&quot;&gt;Occupational roles&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Treatment+effectiveness%22&quot;&gt;Treatment effectiveness&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Retrospective+studies%22&quot;&gt;Retrospective studies&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Descriptive+statistics%22&quot;&gt;Descriptive statistics&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Acquisition+of+data+methodology%22&quot;&gt;Acquisition of data methodology&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Mann+Whitney+U+Test%22&quot;&gt;Mann Whitney U Test&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: Nasal fractures constitute the largest proportion of facial trauma each year, however, there is no consensus management. In this study, we investingated the role of the consultant and the functional and aesthetic outcomes of procedures performed to address nasal bone fractures. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who sustained nasal bone fractures was conducted from 8/1/14 through 1/23/18. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-squared testing and Fisher&#39;s exact test, where appropriate, while continuous variables were compared using Mann–Whitney U testing. Results: During the study period, 136 patients met inclusion criteria for full analysis. The mean age of this cohort was 47.6 &#177; 20.2 years with the majority identifying as African–American (53.7%) and male (67.2%). Otolaryngologists were significantly more likely to assess pre-operative nasal obstruction (100%) compared to plastic surgeons (24.1%) (P &lt;.001). Otolaryngology elected operative management (53.3%) at a significantly higher rate than plastic surgery (24.1%) (P =.005). Additionally, otolaryngology was significantly more likely to manage patients in an outpatient setting (91.2%), whereas plastic surgery more commonly performed inpatient management (57.1%) (P =.006). Plastic surgery averaged a significantly shorter amount of time from presentation to operative management (7.3 &#177; 10.7 days) compared to otolaryngology (20 &#177; 27.7) (P =.019). Consulting service was not associated with a need for revision surgery. Conclusions: Consultants across subspecialties differ in the management of nasal bone trauma. A more standardized approach is warranted by all individuals involved in the care of maxillofacial trauma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of Annals of Otology, Rhinology &amp; Laryngology is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=146871568
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/0003489420931562
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 1120
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Chi-squared test
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Fisher exact test
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical consultants
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical records
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical specialties & specialists
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Nasal bone
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Otolaryngologists
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Surgery practice
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Plastic surgery
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Occupational roles
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Treatment effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Retrospective studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Acquisition of data methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mann Whitney U Test
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Nasal Bone Fractures: Differences Amongst Sub-Specialty Consultants.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cohn, Jason E.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Othman, Sammy
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Toscano, Michael
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shokri, Tom
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bloom, Jason D.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zwillenberg, Seth
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2020
              Type: published
              Y: 2020
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00034894
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 129
            – Type: issue
              Value: 11
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
              Type: main
ResultId 1