View in EDS

Assessing Influenza Vaccination Behaviors Among Medically Underserved Obstetric Patients.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Assessing Influenza Vaccination Behaviors Among Medically Underserved Obstetric Patients.
Authors: Goggins, Emily R., Williams, Rachel, Kim, Tesia G., Adams, Jenna C., Davis, Miah J., McIntosh, Michelle, Uzor, Michelle, Geary, Franklyn, Jamieson, Denise J., Boulet, Sheree L.
Source: Journal of Women's Health (15409996). Jan2021, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p52-60. 9p.
Subjects: Influenza prevention, Attitude (Psychology), Chi-squared test, Confidence intervals, Health attitudes, Influenza vaccines, Longitudinal method, Obstetrics, Patients, Pregnancy & psychology, Vaccination, Multiple regression analysis, Odds ratio, One-way analysis of variance
Abstract: Background: Despite recommendations, maternal influenza vaccine acceptance has stagnated around 50%. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted of pregnant women seen in the clinic from September 2018 to April 2019. Primary outcomes included influenza vaccine uptake and reasons for vaccine refusal, categorized based on the Health Belief Model. We compared characteristics between three vaccination groups (never refused, refused and vaccinated, and refused and not vaccinated) by using chi-square and one-way analysis of variance. We used multivariate logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between patient characteristics and vaccine acceptance. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to explore the impact of provider–patient race concordance on influenza vaccine uptake. Results: Among 1666 women, 902 (54.1%) were vaccinated. Of these, 183 (20.3%) initially refused. Those who refused and were never vaccinated were more likely to be non-Hispanic black (aOR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.05–2.56) and less likely to be Hispanic (aOR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24–0.81). Overall, perceived barriers were the most common reason for refusal (52.4%). Women who refused consistently were more likely to cite reasons related to perceived benefits (38.5% vs. 7.6%). Those who eventually accepted were more likely to cite cue to action (22.4% vs. 12.6%). Women who were race discordant with their provider were more likely to be vaccinated compared with those who were race concordant (57.9% vs. 52.9%, aOR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.07–1.27). Conclusions: Women who refuse influenza vaccination in pregnancy may later choose to be vaccinated. Continued promotion of vaccination throughout pregnancy is crucial for vaccine uptake. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Women's Health (15409996) is the property of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 148188896
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Assessing Influenza Vaccination Behaviors Among Medically Underserved Obstetric Patients.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Goggins%2C+Emily+R%2E%22">Goggins, Emily R.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Williams%2C+Rachel%22">Williams, Rachel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kim%2C+Tesia+G%2E%22">Kim, Tesia G.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Adams%2C+Jenna+C%2E%22">Adams, Jenna C.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Davis%2C+Miah+J%2E%22">Davis, Miah J.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McIntosh%2C+Michelle%22">McIntosh, Michelle</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Uzor%2C+Michelle%22">Uzor, Michelle</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Geary%2C+Franklyn%22">Geary, Franklyn</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jamieson%2C+Denise+J%2E%22">Jamieson, Denise J.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Boulet%2C+Sheree+L%2E%22">Boulet, Sheree L.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Women's+Health+%2815409996%29%22">Journal of Women's Health (15409996)</searchLink>. Jan2021, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p52-60. 9p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Influenza+prevention%22">Influenza prevention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attitude+%28Psychology%29%22">Attitude (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Chi-squared+test%22">Chi-squared test</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+attitudes%22">Health attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Influenza+vaccines%22">Influenza vaccines</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Longitudinal+method%22">Longitudinal method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Obstetrics%22">Obstetrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patients%22">Patients</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pregnancy+%26+psychology%22">Pregnancy & psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vaccination%22">Vaccination</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multiple+regression+analysis%22">Multiple regression analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Odds+ratio%22">Odds ratio</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22One-way+analysis+of+variance%22">One-way analysis of variance</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: Despite recommendations, maternal influenza vaccine acceptance has stagnated around 50%. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted of pregnant women seen in the clinic from September 2018 to April 2019. Primary outcomes included influenza vaccine uptake and reasons for vaccine refusal, categorized based on the Health Belief Model. We compared characteristics between three vaccination groups (never refused, refused and vaccinated, and refused and not vaccinated) by using chi-square and one-way analysis of variance. We used multivariate logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between patient characteristics and vaccine acceptance. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to explore the impact of provider–patient race concordance on influenza vaccine uptake. Results: Among 1666 women, 902 (54.1%) were vaccinated. Of these, 183 (20.3%) initially refused. Those who refused and were never vaccinated were more likely to be non-Hispanic black (aOR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.05–2.56) and less likely to be Hispanic (aOR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24–0.81). Overall, perceived barriers were the most common reason for refusal (52.4%). Women who refused consistently were more likely to cite reasons related to perceived benefits (38.5% vs. 7.6%). Those who eventually accepted were more likely to cite cue to action (22.4% vs. 12.6%). Women who were race discordant with their provider were more likely to be vaccinated compared with those who were race concordant (57.9% vs. 52.9%, aOR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.07–1.27). Conclusions: Women who refuse influenza vaccination in pregnancy may later choose to be vaccinated. Continued promotion of vaccination throughout pregnancy is crucial for vaccine uptake. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Women's Health (15409996) is the property of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=148188896
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8582
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 52
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Influenza prevention
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Attitude (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Chi-squared test
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Influenza vaccines
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Longitudinal method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Obstetrics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Patients
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pregnancy & psychology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Vaccination
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Multiple regression analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Odds ratio
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: One-way analysis of variance
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Assessing Influenza Vaccination Behaviors Among Medically Underserved Obstetric Patients.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Goggins, Emily R.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Williams, Rachel
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kim, Tesia G.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Adams, Jenna C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Davis, Miah J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: McIntosh, Michelle
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Uzor, Michelle
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Geary, Franklyn
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jamieson, Denise J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Boulet, Sheree L.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: Jan2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 15409996
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 30
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Women's Health (15409996)
              Type: main
ResultId 1