How physical interaction with insight problems affects solution rates, hint use, and cognitive load.
Saved in:
| Title: | How physical interaction with insight problems affects solution rates, hint use, and cognitive load. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Chuderski, Adam, Jastrzębski, Jan, Kucwaj, Hanna |
| Source: | British Journal of Psychology. Feb2021, Vol. 112 Issue 1, p120-143. 24p. 1 Color Photograph, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts, 1 Graph. |
| Subjects: | Cognition disorders, Memory, Problem solving, Cognition, Creative ability, Task performance, Interpersonal relations, Statistical correlation, Adults |
| Abstract: | So‐called insight problems are widely studied because they tap into the creative thinking that is crucial for solving real problems. However, insight problems are typically presented in static formats (on paper, computer) that allow no physical interaction with the problem elements, whereas such an interaction might in fact reduce the load on limited cognitive resources, such as working memory (WM) capacity, thereby facilitating solutions. To test this proposition, 124 young adults were allowed to interact physically with nine established insight problems, while another 124 people attempted to solve these problems using paper and pencil. Additionally, hints were provided for three problems that typically no‐one solves. No general facilitating effect of physical interaction was found, with only one problem clearly benefitting from it. Furthermore, making use of hints was actually hindered by physical interaction. No difference in perceived task load and correlation with WM capacity was observed between the formats, and subjective ratings of insight were virtually unaffected by presentation format. Overall, physical interaction minimally affected insight problem‐solving, which appears to rely strongly on internalized cognitive processing involving WM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of British Journal of Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 149077303 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: How physical interaction with insight problems affects solution rates, hint use, and cognitive load. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chuderski%2C+Adam%22">Chuderski, Adam</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jastrzębski%2C+Jan%22">Jastrzębski, Jan</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kucwaj%2C+Hanna%22">Kucwaj, Hanna</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22British+Journal+of+Psychology%22">British Journal of Psychology</searchLink>. Feb2021, Vol. 112 Issue 1, p120-143. 24p. 1 Color Photograph, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts, 1 Graph. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognition+disorders%22">Cognition disorders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Memory%22">Memory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Problem+solving%22">Problem solving</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognition%22">Cognition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Creative+ability%22">Creative ability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Task+performance%22">Task performance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interpersonal+relations%22">Interpersonal relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+correlation%22">Statistical correlation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adults%22">Adults</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: So‐called insight problems are widely studied because they tap into the creative thinking that is crucial for solving real problems. However, insight problems are typically presented in static formats (on paper, computer) that allow no physical interaction with the problem elements, whereas such an interaction might in fact reduce the load on limited cognitive resources, such as working memory (WM) capacity, thereby facilitating solutions. To test this proposition, 124 young adults were allowed to interact physically with nine established insight problems, while another 124 people attempted to solve these problems using paper and pencil. Additionally, hints were provided for three problems that typically no‐one solves. No general facilitating effect of physical interaction was found, with only one problem clearly benefitting from it. Furthermore, making use of hints was actually hindered by physical interaction. No difference in perceived task load and correlation with WM capacity was observed between the formats, and subjective ratings of insight were virtually unaffected by presentation format. Overall, physical interaction minimally affected insight problem‐solving, which appears to rely strongly on internalized cognitive processing involving WM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of British Journal of Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=149077303 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/bjop.12442 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 24 StartPage: 120 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Cognition disorders Type: general – SubjectFull: Memory Type: general – SubjectFull: Problem solving Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognition Type: general – SubjectFull: Creative ability Type: general – SubjectFull: Task performance Type: general – SubjectFull: Interpersonal relations Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical correlation Type: general – SubjectFull: Adults Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: How physical interaction with insight problems affects solution rates, hint use, and cognitive load. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Chuderski, Adam – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jastrzębski, Jan – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kucwaj, Hanna IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 02 Text: Feb2021 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00071269 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 112 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: British Journal of Psychology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |