A comprehensive meta‐analysis of the comparison question polygraph test.
Saved in:
| Title: | A comprehensive meta‐analysis of the comparison question polygraph test. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Honts, Charles R. (AUTHOR), Thurber, Steven (AUTHOR), Handler, Mark (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Applied Cognitive Psychology. Mar2021, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p411-427. 17p. 4 Charts, 2 Graphs. |
| Subjects: | Lie detectors & detection, Deception, Publication bias |
| Abstract: | We conducted a meta‐analysis on the most commonly used forensic polygraph test, the Comparison Question Test. We captured as many studies as possible by using broad inclusion criteria. Data and potential moderators were coded from 138 datasets. The meta‐analytic effect size including inconclusive outcomes was 0.69 [0.66, 0.79]. We found significant moderator effects. Notably, level of motivation had a positive linear relationship with our outcome measures. Information Gain analysis of CQT outcomes representing the median accuracy showed a significant information increase over interpersonal deception detection across almost the complete range of base rates. Our results suggest that the CQT can be accurate, that experimental studies are generalizable, and no publication bias was detected. We discussed the limitations of the field research literature and problems within polygraph profession that lower field accuracy. We suggest some possible solutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Applied Cognitive Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 149411713 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A comprehensive meta‐analysis of the comparison question polygraph test. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Honts%2C+Charles+R%2E%22">Honts, Charles R.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thurber%2C+Steven%22">Thurber, Steven</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Handler%2C+Mark%22">Handler, Mark</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Applied+Cognitive+Psychology%22">Applied Cognitive Psychology</searchLink>. Mar2021, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p411-427. 17p. 4 Charts, 2 Graphs. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lie+detectors+%26+detection%22">Lie detectors & detection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Deception%22">Deception</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Publication+bias%22">Publication bias</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: We conducted a meta‐analysis on the most commonly used forensic polygraph test, the Comparison Question Test. We captured as many studies as possible by using broad inclusion criteria. Data and potential moderators were coded from 138 datasets. The meta‐analytic effect size including inconclusive outcomes was 0.69 [0.66, 0.79]. We found significant moderator effects. Notably, level of motivation had a positive linear relationship with our outcome measures. Information Gain analysis of CQT outcomes representing the median accuracy showed a significant information increase over interpersonal deception detection across almost the complete range of base rates. Our results suggest that the CQT can be accurate, that experimental studies are generalizable, and no publication bias was detected. We discussed the limitations of the field research literature and problems within polygraph profession that lower field accuracy. We suggest some possible solutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Applied Cognitive Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=149411713 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/acp.3779 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 17 StartPage: 411 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Lie detectors & detection Type: general – SubjectFull: Deception Type: general – SubjectFull: Publication bias Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A comprehensive meta‐analysis of the comparison question polygraph test. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Honts, Charles R. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Thurber, Steven – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Handler, Mark IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Text: Mar2021 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 08884080 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 35 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Applied Cognitive Psychology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
