Does Disgust Drive Religious Freedom Attitudes? Experimental Results About the Context of Service Refusal Opinion.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Does Disgust Drive Religious Freedom Attitudes? Experimental Results About the Context of Service Refusal Opinion.
Authors:	Djupe, Paul A. (AUTHOR), Lewis, Andrew R. (AUTHOR), Sokhey, Anand E. (AUTHOR), Burge, Ryan P. (AUTHOR)
Source:	Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell). Mar2021, Vol. 102 Issue 2, p755-770. 16p. 1 Chart, 5 Graphs.
Subjects:	Attitudes toward religion, Freedom of religion, Aversion, Free exercise clause (Constitutional law), Public support
Geographic Terms:	Colorado
Abstract:	Objective: What factors shape public support for service refusals carried out in the name of the free exercise of religion? Existing analyses treat the businesses refusing to serve LGBT citizens as fungible. We hypothesize that the religious context does not matter and that reactions are consistent with the role of socialized disgust. Methods: We engage the same experimental design in two 2019 samples, one of 800 Colorado adult residents and one of 1,010 Protestants. The 1 × 2 × 2 design enables a contrast between a control, conditions that vary the business between a florist and photographer, and conditions that vary the religious nature of the event. Results: The results suggest that the religious nature of the context is immaterial and that reactions generally conform with the role of disgust, especially for those socialized to feel it—high attending evangelicals. Conclusion: We affirm the importance of the context of service delivery for religious freedom attitudes and discuss the role of religion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection

Description
Abstract:	Objective: What factors shape public support for service refusals carried out in the name of the free exercise of religion? Existing analyses treat the businesses refusing to serve LGBT citizens as fungible. We hypothesize that the religious context does not matter and that reactions are consistent with the role of socialized disgust. Methods: We engage the same experimental design in two 2019 samples, one of 800 Colorado adult residents and one of 1,010 Protestants. The 1 × 2 × 2 design enables a contrast between a control, conditions that vary the business between a florist and photographer, and conditions that vary the religious nature of the event. Results: The results suggest that the religious nature of the context is immaterial and that reactions generally conform with the role of disgust, especially for those socialized to feel it—high attending evangelicals. Conclusion: We affirm the importance of the context of service delivery for religious freedom attitudes and discuss the role of religion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	00384941
DOI:	10.1111/ssqu.12934