View in EDS

The reliability and validity of a digital version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The reliability and validity of a digital version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool.
Authors: Rosen, Adam B., Johnston, Madison, Chung, Sunghoon, Burcal, Christopher J.
Source: Disability & Rehabilitation. Jun2021, Vol. 43 Issue 12, p1738-1741. 4p.
Subjects: Statistics, Statistical reliability, Confidence intervals, Confidence, Scientific observation, Digital technology, Research methodology evaluation, Ankle, Health outcome assessment, Sprains, Ankle injuries, Psychometrics, Randomized controlled trials, Research funding, Intraclass correlation, Descriptive statistics, Electronic health records, Statistical sampling, Crossover trials, Data analysis software, Joint hypermobility
Abstract: The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool is a common patient reported outcome used to assess those with Chronic Ankle Instability. However, paper versions of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool have only been assessed for reliability purposes. The purpose of this study was to assess the agreement and reliability of a digital version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool-Digital. Sixty-eight participants with a history of ankle sprain(s) were recruited to participate in this study. Participants completed a paper version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool and a digital version then returned one week later and completed them again. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Kappa coefficients were used to determine the agreement between the paper and digital versions as well as test-retest reliability between the two time periods. The digital version showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89–0.96) with the paper version. The test-retest reliability between testing sessions was considered good (ICC = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77–0.92). A majority of individual items on the digital version demonstrated substantial agreement (κ = 0.60–0.81) with the paper version. A digital version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool demonstrated good to excellent psychometric properties. Clinicians who utilize a digital version as part of an electronic medical record system can utilize them confidently to accurately assess patients with Chronic Ankle Instability. Future studies may want to consider assessing a digital version with expanded clinical and research populations. The digital version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool demonstrated adequate psychometric properties. The digital version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool can be considered a reliable instrument for the assessment of Chronic Ankle Instability. A digital version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool can provide automated scoring and quick administration for clinicians in a rehabilitation setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Disability & Rehabilitation is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 150986876
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The reliability and validity of a digital version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rosen%2C+Adam+B%2E%22">Rosen, Adam B.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Johnston%2C+Madison%22">Johnston, Madison</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chung%2C+Sunghoon%22">Chung, Sunghoon</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burcal%2C+Christopher+J%2E%22">Burcal, Christopher J.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Disability+%26+Rehabilitation%22">Disability & Rehabilitation</searchLink>. Jun2021, Vol. 43 Issue 12, p1738-1741. 4p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistics%22">Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+reliability%22">Statistical reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence%22">Confidence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scientific+observation%22">Scientific observation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Digital+technology%22">Digital technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology+evaluation%22">Research methodology evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ankle%22">Ankle</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+outcome+assessment%22">Health outcome assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sprains%22">Sprains</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ankle+injuries%22">Ankle injuries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychometrics%22">Psychometrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Randomized+controlled+trials%22">Randomized controlled trials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intraclass+correlation%22">Intraclass correlation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electronic+health+records%22">Electronic health records</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+sampling%22">Statistical sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Crossover+trials%22">Crossover trials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Joint+hypermobility%22">Joint hypermobility</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool is a common patient reported outcome used to assess those with Chronic Ankle Instability. However, paper versions of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool have only been assessed for reliability purposes. The purpose of this study was to assess the agreement and reliability of a digital version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool-Digital. Sixty-eight participants with a history of ankle sprain(s) were recruited to participate in this study. Participants completed a paper version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool and a digital version then returned one week later and completed them again. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Kappa coefficients were used to determine the agreement between the paper and digital versions as well as test-retest reliability between the two time periods. The digital version showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89–0.96) with the paper version. The test-retest reliability between testing sessions was considered good (ICC = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77–0.92). A majority of individual items on the digital version demonstrated substantial agreement (κ = 0.60–0.81) with the paper version. A digital version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool demonstrated good to excellent psychometric properties. Clinicians who utilize a digital version as part of an electronic medical record system can utilize them confidently to accurately assess patients with Chronic Ankle Instability. Future studies may want to consider assessing a digital version with expanded clinical and research populations. The digital version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool demonstrated adequate psychometric properties. The digital version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool can be considered a reliable instrument for the assessment of Chronic Ankle Instability. A digital version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool can provide automated scoring and quick administration for clinicians in a rehabilitation setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Disability & Rehabilitation is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=150986876
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1671504
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 4
        StartPage: 1738
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical reliability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Confidence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scientific observation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Digital technology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ankle
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health outcome assessment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sprains
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ankle injuries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychometrics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Randomized controlled trials
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research funding
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Intraclass correlation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Electronic health records
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical sampling
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Crossover trials
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Joint hypermobility
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The reliability and validity of a digital version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rosen, Adam B.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Johnston, Madison
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chung, Sunghoon
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Burcal, Christopher J.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 15
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09638288
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 43
            – Type: issue
              Value: 12
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Disability & Rehabilitation
              Type: main
ResultId 1