Cognitive assessment using the Rapid Assessment for Developmental Disabilities, Second Edition (RADD‐2).
Saved in:
| Title: | Cognitive assessment using the Rapid Assessment for Developmental Disabilities, Second Edition (RADD‐2). |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Hom, C. L., Walsh, D., Fernandez, G., Tournay, A., Touchette, P., Lott, I. T. |
| Source: | Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. Sep2021, Vol. 65 Issue 9, p831-848. 18p. 7 Charts, 2 Graphs. |
| Subjects: | Cognition disorders, Adaptability (Personality), Communicative competence, Research methodology evaluation, Research methodology, Epilepsy, Developmental disabilities, Child behavior, Discriminant analysis, Psychometrics, Questionnaires, Evaluation |
| Abstract: | Background: Individuals with developmental disabilities (DD) often have severe impairments and maladaptive behaviours that make it difficult to reliably assess their cognitive abilities. Given these challenges, the Rapid Assessment of Developmental Disabilities, Second Edition (RADD‐2), was designed to measure general cognitive ability in this population. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the battery's psychometric properties when used with individuals with DD who have challenging behavioural and psychiatric conditions and for those who have limited verbal skills. Method: The cognitive and adaptive behaviour skills of 193 children and adults with DD and considerable medical, behavioural and/or psychiatric problems were evaluated using the first and second editions of the RADD, Kaufmann Brief Intelligence Test – 2nd Edition, and Scales of Independent Behaviour – Revised Edition. Medication side effects and challenging behaviours were assessed using the Aberrant Behaviour Checklist. Results: There were no floor or ceiling effects on the RADD‐2. Both the nonverbal index and total scores had strong concurrent validity with other abbreviated tests of intellectual ability and good discriminant validity from measures of adaptive behaviour and medication side effects. RADD‐2 scores also had strong criterion validity as they successfully differentiated between all levels of intellectual functioning. Age and sex did not differentially affect RADD‐2 performance, and the co‐occurrence of psychiatric conditions did not negatively affect performance. The only medical condition associated with lower RADD‐2 performance was epilepsy. Conclusions: The RADD‐2 can quantify the differential cognitive abilities of individuals with DD, even for those with minimal communication skills, challenging behaviours or severe medication side effects that can typically complicate assessment. This brief cognitive battery can be used to measure changes due to interventions, on the one hand, and progression of neurological disease, on the other. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
Be the first to leave a comment!
