View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Disordered eating measures validated in pregnancy samples: a systematic review.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Disordered eating measures validated in pregnancy samples: a systematic review.
Authors: Bannatyne, Amy Jean (AUTHOR), McNeil, Elyse (AUTHOR), Stapleton, Peta (AUTHOR), MacKenzie-Shalders, Kristen (AUTHOR), Watt, Bruce (AUTHOR)
Source: Eating Disorders. Jul-Aug2021, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p421-446. 26p. 5 Charts.
Subjects: Psychology information storage & retrieval systems, CINAHL database, Medical information storage & retrieval systems, Research methodology evaluation, Systematic reviews, Research methodology, Medical screening, Interviewing, Psychometrics, Questionnaires, MEDLINE, Eating disorders
Abstract: Although disordered eating in pregnancy has been linked to numerous negative consequences, there is currently no published instrument specifically devised to identify or measure such symptoms in pregnancy. As such, this study systematically reviewed the literature to evaluate the performance of general measures of disordered eating in pregnancy samples. A systematic search of the following electronic databases was undertaken from inception to April 2019: Scopus, Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. From 1724 citations, eight publications met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Most of the included studies (6/8) were of reasonable quality. Overall, three self-report inventories (EDE-Q, EDI-2, and DEBS) and one semi-structured clinical interview (EDE) had some form of psychometric information available. Most studies reported reliability, with only two reporting validity. No studies assessed screening accuracy. Other than the EDE-Q, which had preliminary evidence to suggest possible utility in pregnancy, the findings of this review revealed little to no evidence to support the use of general measures of disordered eating in pregnancy. A strong need for research exploring the validity of existing measures in pregnancy samples, including the EDE-Q, was also evident. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Eating Disorders is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 152273951
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Disordered eating measures validated in pregnancy samples: a systematic review.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bannatyne%2C+Amy+Jean%22">Bannatyne, Amy Jean</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McNeil%2C+Elyse%22">McNeil, Elyse</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stapleton%2C+Peta%22">Stapleton, Peta</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22MacKenzie-Shalders%2C+Kristen%22">MacKenzie-Shalders, Kristen</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Watt%2C+Bruce%22">Watt, Bruce</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Eating+Disorders%22">Eating Disorders</searchLink>. Jul-Aug2021, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p421-446. 26p. 5 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Psychology information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22CINAHL+database%22">CINAHL database</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Medical information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology+evaluation%22">Research methodology evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systematic+reviews%22">Systematic reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+screening%22">Medical screening</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychometrics%22">Psychometrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDLINE%22">MEDLINE</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Eating+disorders%22">Eating disorders</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Although disordered eating in pregnancy has been linked to numerous negative consequences, there is currently no published instrument specifically devised to identify or measure such symptoms in pregnancy. As such, this study systematically reviewed the literature to evaluate the performance of general measures of disordered eating in pregnancy samples. A systematic search of the following electronic databases was undertaken from inception to April 2019: Scopus, Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. From 1724 citations, eight publications met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Most of the included studies (6/8) were of reasonable quality. Overall, three self-report inventories (EDE-Q, EDI-2, and DEBS) and one semi-structured clinical interview (EDE) had some form of psychometric information available. Most studies reported reliability, with only two reporting validity. No studies assessed screening accuracy. Other than the EDE-Q, which had preliminary evidence to suggest possible utility in pregnancy, the findings of this review revealed little to no evidence to support the use of general measures of disordered eating in pregnancy. A strong need for research exploring the validity of existing measures in pregnancy samples, including the EDE-Q, was also evident. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Eating Disorders is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=152273951
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/10640266.2019.1663478
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 26
        StartPage: 421
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Psychology information storage & retrieval systems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: CINAHL database
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical information storage & retrieval systems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical screening
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interviewing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychometrics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Questionnaires
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: MEDLINE
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Eating disorders
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Disordered eating measures validated in pregnancy samples: a systematic review.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bannatyne, Amy Jean
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: McNeil, Elyse
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stapleton, Peta
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: MacKenzie-Shalders, Kristen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Watt, Bruce
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: Jul-Aug2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10640266
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 29
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Eating Disorders
              Type: main
ResultId 1