View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Analysis of a Modification to the Sexual Experiences Survey to Assess Intimate Partner Sexual Violence.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Analysis of a Modification to the Sexual Experiences Survey to Assess Intimate Partner Sexual Violence.
Authors: Anderson, RaeAnn E., Holmes, Samantha C., Johnson, Nicole L., Johnson, Dawn M.
Source: Journal of Sex Research. Nov/Dec 2021, Vol. 58 Issue 9, p1140-1150. 11p. 3 Charts.
Subjects: Victimization rates, Sex crimes, Intimate partner violence, Prevention of sexual assault, Crimes against women
Abstract: Greater accuracy is needed in the assessment of sexual victimization that occurs in intimate relationships. Existing assessment strategies in the literature often represent two distinct approaches – intimate partner violence specific strategies vs. sexual violence specific strategies. The current study compared multiple distinct strategies for assessing intimate partner sexual victimization (IPSV) and evaluated a modification that optimizes intimate partner and sexual violence specific strategies. Two samples of undergraduate women were recruited. Sample 1 (N = 236) completed the Severity of Violence Against Women Scales (SVAWS) and a modified version Sexual Experiences Survey–Short Form Victimization (SES-SFV) in which participants were cued to respond both for romantic partners and non-partners (referred to as the SES-RP/NP). Sample 2 (N = 206) completed the SVAWS and was randomized to either the traditional SES-SFV or the SES-RP/NP. Across samples, the prevalence of IPSV varied based on the measure used (SVAWS = 11.7%; SES-SFV = 17.0%; SES-RP/NP = 25.4%). The SES-RP/NP identified significantly more IPSV than the SES-SFV, SVAWS, and prior studies. Both the SES-SFV and the SES-RP/NP were positively and significantly associated with the SVAWS. The results suggested that optimal measurement of IPSV would consider both intimate partner and sexual violence strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Sex Research is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 153296747
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Analysis of a Modification to the Sexual Experiences Survey to Assess Intimate Partner Sexual Violence.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Anderson%2C+RaeAnn+E%2E%22">Anderson, RaeAnn E.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Holmes%2C+Samantha+C%2E%22">Holmes, Samantha C.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Johnson%2C+Nicole+L%2E%22">Johnson, Nicole L.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Johnson%2C+Dawn+M%2E%22">Johnson, Dawn M.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Sex+Research%22">Journal of Sex Research</searchLink>. Nov/Dec 2021, Vol. 58 Issue 9, p1140-1150. 11p. 3 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Victimization+rates%22">Victimization rates</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sex+crimes%22">Sex crimes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intimate+partner+violence%22">Intimate partner violence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prevention+of+sexual+assault%22">Prevention of sexual assault</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Crimes+against+women%22">Crimes against women</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Greater accuracy is needed in the assessment of sexual victimization that occurs in intimate relationships. Existing assessment strategies in the literature often represent two distinct approaches – intimate partner violence specific strategies vs. sexual violence specific strategies. The current study compared multiple distinct strategies for assessing intimate partner sexual victimization (IPSV) and evaluated a modification that optimizes intimate partner and sexual violence specific strategies. Two samples of undergraduate women were recruited. Sample 1 (N = 236) completed the Severity of Violence Against Women Scales (SVAWS) and a modified version Sexual Experiences Survey–Short Form Victimization (SES-SFV) in which participants were cued to respond both for romantic partners and non-partners (referred to as the SES-RP/NP). Sample 2 (N = 206) completed the SVAWS and was randomized to either the traditional SES-SFV or the SES-RP/NP. Across samples, the prevalence of IPSV varied based on the measure used (SVAWS = 11.7%; SES-SFV = 17.0%; SES-RP/NP = 25.4%). The SES-RP/NP identified significantly more IPSV than the SES-SFV, SVAWS, and prior studies. Both the SES-SFV and the SES-RP/NP were positively and significantly associated with the SVAWS. The results suggested that optimal measurement of IPSV would consider both intimate partner and sexual violence strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Sex Research is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=153296747
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/00224499.2020.1766404
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
        StartPage: 1140
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Victimization rates
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sex crimes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Intimate partner violence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Prevention of sexual assault
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Crimes against women
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Analysis of a Modification to the Sexual Experiences Survey to Assess Intimate Partner Sexual Violence.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Anderson, RaeAnn E.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Holmes, Samantha C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Johnson, Nicole L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Johnson, Dawn M.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov/Dec 2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00224499
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 58
            – Type: issue
              Value: 9
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Sex Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1