A framework to make PROMs relevant to patients: qualitative study of communication preferences of PROMs.
Saved in:
| Title: | A framework to make PROMs relevant to patients: qualitative study of communication preferences of PROMs. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Lai, Cara H., Shapiro, Lauren M., Amanatullah, Derek F., Chou, Loretta B., Gardner, Michael J., Hu, Serena S., Safran, Marc R., Kamal, Robin N. |
| Source: | Quality of Life Research. Apr2022, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p1093-1103. 11p. 2 Diagrams, 2 Charts. |
| Subjects: | Orthopedic surgery, Health status indicators, Qualitative research, Physicians, Medical decision making |
| Abstract: | Purpose: Patient-reported outcome measures are tools for evaluating symptoms, magnitude of limitations, baseline health status, and outcomes from the patient's perspective. Healthcare professional organizations and payers increasingly recommend PROMs for clinical care, but there lacks guidance regarding effective communication of PROMs with orthopedic surgery patients. This qualitative study aimed to identify (1) patient attitudes toward the use and communication of PROMs, and (2) what patients feel are the most relevant or important aspects of PROM results to discuss with their physicians. Methods: Participants were recruited from a multispeciality orthopedic clinic. Three PROMs: the EuroQol-5 Dimension, the Patient-Specific Functional Scale, and the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test were shown and a semi-structured interview was conducted to elicit PROMs attitudes and preferences. Interviews were transcribed and inductive-deductively coded. Coded excerpts were aggregated to (1) identify major themes and (2) analyze how themes interacted. Result: Three themes emerged: (1) Beliefs toward the purpose of PROMs, (2) PROMs as a reflection of self, and (3) PROMs to facilitate communication and guide healthcare decisions. These themes informed a framework outlining the patient perspective on communicating PROMs during clinical care. Conclusion: Patient attitudes toward the use and communication of PROMs start with the incorporation of patient beliefs, which can facilitate or act as a barrier to engagement. Patients should ideally believe that PROMs are an accurate reflection of personal health state before incorporation into care. Clinicians should endeavor to communicate the purpose of a chosen PROM in line with a patient's unique needs and what they feel is most relevant to their own care. Aspects of PROMs results which may be helpful to address include providing context for what scores mean and how they are calculated, and using scores as a way to weigh risks and benefits of treatment and tracking progress over time. Future research can focus on the effect of communication strategies on patient outcomes and engagement in care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Quality of Life Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 156399524 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A framework to make PROMs relevant to patients: qualitative study of communication preferences of PROMs. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lai%2C+Cara+H%2E%22">Lai, Cara H.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shapiro%2C+Lauren+M%2E%22">Shapiro, Lauren M.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Amanatullah%2C+Derek+F%2E%22">Amanatullah, Derek F.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chou%2C+Loretta+B%2E%22">Chou, Loretta B.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gardner%2C+Michael+J%2E%22">Gardner, Michael J.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hu%2C+Serena+S%2E%22">Hu, Serena S.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Safran%2C+Marc+R%2E%22">Safran, Marc R.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kamal%2C+Robin+N%2E%22">Kamal, Robin N.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Quality+of+Life+Research%22">Quality of Life Research</searchLink>. Apr2022, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p1093-1103. 11p. 2 Diagrams, 2 Charts. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Orthopedic+surgery%22">Orthopedic surgery</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+status+indicators%22">Health status indicators</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Qualitative+research%22">Qualitative research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Physicians%22">Physicians</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+decision+making%22">Medical decision making</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Purpose: Patient-reported outcome measures are tools for evaluating symptoms, magnitude of limitations, baseline health status, and outcomes from the patient's perspective. Healthcare professional organizations and payers increasingly recommend PROMs for clinical care, but there lacks guidance regarding effective communication of PROMs with orthopedic surgery patients. This qualitative study aimed to identify (1) patient attitudes toward the use and communication of PROMs, and (2) what patients feel are the most relevant or important aspects of PROM results to discuss with their physicians. Methods: Participants were recruited from a multispeciality orthopedic clinic. Three PROMs: the EuroQol-5 Dimension, the Patient-Specific Functional Scale, and the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test were shown and a semi-structured interview was conducted to elicit PROMs attitudes and preferences. Interviews were transcribed and inductive-deductively coded. Coded excerpts were aggregated to (1) identify major themes and (2) analyze how themes interacted. Result: Three themes emerged: (1) Beliefs toward the purpose of PROMs, (2) PROMs as a reflection of self, and (3) PROMs to facilitate communication and guide healthcare decisions. These themes informed a framework outlining the patient perspective on communicating PROMs during clinical care. Conclusion: Patient attitudes toward the use and communication of PROMs start with the incorporation of patient beliefs, which can facilitate or act as a barrier to engagement. Patients should ideally believe that PROMs are an accurate reflection of personal health state before incorporation into care. Clinicians should endeavor to communicate the purpose of a chosen PROM in line with a patient's unique needs and what they feel is most relevant to their own care. Aspects of PROMs results which may be helpful to address include providing context for what scores mean and how they are calculated, and using scores as a way to weigh risks and benefits of treatment and tracking progress over time. Future research can focus on the effect of communication strategies on patient outcomes and engagement in care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Quality of Life Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=156399524 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s11136-021-02972-5 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 11 StartPage: 1093 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Orthopedic surgery Type: general – SubjectFull: Health status indicators Type: general – SubjectFull: Qualitative research Type: general – SubjectFull: Physicians Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical decision making Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A framework to make PROMs relevant to patients: qualitative study of communication preferences of PROMs. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lai, Cara H. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Shapiro, Lauren M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Amanatullah, Derek F. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Chou, Loretta B. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gardner, Michael J. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hu, Serena S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Safran, Marc R. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kamal, Robin N. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Text: Apr2022 Type: published Y: 2022 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 09629343 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 31 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Quality of Life Research Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
